User talk:Hairwizard91

Source of 高麗史

高麗史26卷-世家26-元宗2-10-29-1269[1],

甲子蒙古使于婁大于　等六人偕倭人來　出迎于郊初申思佺與倭人謁帝帝大喜曰: "爾國王祗　朕命使爾等往日本爾等不以險阻爲辭入不測之地生還復命忠節可嘉." 厚賜匹帛以至從卒又謂倭人曰: "爾國朝覲中國其來尙矣今朕欲爾國之來朝非以逼汝也但欲垂名於後耳." 賚予甚稠　令觀覽宮殿旣而倭人奏云: "臣等聞有天堂佛刹正謂是也." 帝悅又使　觀燕京萬壽山玉殿與諸城闕.

高麗史29卷-世家29-忠烈王2-08-30-1282[2],

蠻軍摠把沈聰等六人自日本逃來言: "本明州人至元十八年六月十八日從葛刺　萬戶上船至日本値惡風船敗. 衆軍十三四萬同　一山十月初八日日本軍至我軍飢不能戰皆降日本擇留工匠及知田者餘皆殺之." 王遣上將軍印侯郞將柳庇押聰等送于元.

Please let me hear your impression. --NekoNekoTeacher 15:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... It is natural that some of the total army is defeated. But, you said that the entire army is defeated by Japan. --Hairwizard91 15:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I am not sure they are actually the army who attacked Japan. the number of soldiers are 130,000~140,000. It is larger than the entire army who attacked Japan.

The anwer is here. When is it 至元十八年? I do not know when 至元十八年 is. Do you know?

Moreover, who is he, 蠻軍. It is usually said the barbarian who lived in the south of China. --Hairwizard91 15:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let's discuss it by the same rule as me. Please write the source that proves your　insistence. And, please write Mongol invasions of Japan on which yours insists. Please let me hear the impression to this information. How did you understand the meaning of this Chinese character? 日本軍至我軍飢不能戰皆降日本擇留工匠及知田者餘皆殺之--NekoNekoTeacher 15:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See when it is... It is one year later after the war ends. Moreover, the army is not allied soldier of Korean and Mongol. They are 蠻軍. Japan just kill 蠻軍. You may know the meaning of 蠻. They are barbarian who live southern area from China. --Hairwizard91 16:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where in "Japan just kill 蠻 army" source is this being written?　Moreover, 蠻 is not being written the barbarian. Are you insisting on the episode not being written in the source?--NekoNekoTeacher 16:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. You have no ability to translate chinese character. See what you have already cited.

"#高麗史29卷-世家29-忠烈王2-08-30-1282[3],

蠻軍摠把沈聰等六人自日本逃來言: "本明州人至元十八年六月十八日從葛刺　萬戶上船至日本値惡風船敗. 衆軍十三四萬同　一山十月初八日日本軍至我軍飢不能戰皆降日本擇留工匠及知田者餘皆殺之." 王遣上將軍印侯郞將柳庇押聰等送于元."

Do you want me to translate the above sentence into english??

Yes. Please translate with this document. #高麗史29卷-世家29-忠烈王2-06-63-1280 茶丘　都率蒙麗漢四萬軍發合浦范文虎率蠻軍十萬發江南俱會日本

And, please teach the reason why you call people in a Chinese southern part a barbarian. --NekoNekoTeacher 16:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barbarian in south of China

See this article Han_chauvinism.

You understand completely by mistake. Please translate Please translate with this document. #高麗史29卷-世家29-忠烈王2-06-63-1280 茶丘　都率蒙麗漢四萬軍發合浦范文虎率蠻軍十萬發江南俱會日本--NekoNekoTeacher 16:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I need to study again. Thanks. --Hairwizard91 17:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

It is very pleasure to know you. I want you to teach me if there is distorting history related to Korea, Japan and China. About the war of Mongol and Japan, you must be right. --Hairwizard91 18:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad to meet the you who loves history of China.

I keep demanding. Please write your correct history. Perhaps, I can point out your mistake. And, Will you still complete the translation of Chinese?　--NekoNekoTeacher 10:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Milhist

Hi Hairwizard, I saw that you have been doing a lot of work on pre-20th century Korean history in Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/History, so I didn't add anything ancient to Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Milhist. If you would prefer to keep ancient military history under History or move it to Military History, either one will be fine with me. --Reuben 21:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Korean War source

저는 한국말 어느 정도 할 수 있는데, 한국 사람이 아닙니다. Is your source a paper book, or something on the internet? --Reuben 18:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have added the link to the military history working group page. Reading an entire book in Korean is a tall order for me, but other users will definitely appreciate them. --Reuben 19:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal Japanese Occupation

I have reverted your move of Korea under Japanese rule to the above listed title because it is a biased title that has no placement in Wikipedia. Please do not repeat such edits in the future.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever the title you are thinking of using is not a proper title for the article. It does not conform to a neutral point of view. "Japanese occupation of Korea" would be a proper title, but "Illegal" is something improperly translated.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal means that there is a law against it. What is the Korean word for the title you wish to use? Maybe I can help you.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. Not what is "illegal" in Korean, but what is the title you want it to be in Korean?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Hwandu1.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Hwandu1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Visviva 16:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And more...

I have noted several others as clear copyright violations. This is particularly disturbing, since I know that you have been warned about violating image copyrights in the past. Yet you have continued to steal content and post it on Wikipedia in a way that casts discredit on both Wikipedia and your contributions.

This sort of behavior is making it increasingly difficult for any of us to assume good faith. Please show us that you are willing to change your ways, and provide *correct* source and licensing information for all images you have contributed. Thank you. -- Visviva 16:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I believe I've tagged most of the copyright violations, including the Bulgogi, Surasang, and Yukhoe images. If you can provide proper source information for *any* of the various photos that you have uploaded, please do so. Quickly. -- Visviva 14:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:An3_entrance.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:An3_entrance.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Joseonagent.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Joseonagent.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:An3_outline.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:An3_outline.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

안부 전해 드립니다

안녕하십니까? Hairwizard씨. I noticed you haven't been around for a while. Hope you are well. Thank-you for your contributions. I hope you can understand our concern about Korean history and I hope to see your continued Wikipedia activities again soon. You have a formidable skill in Hanja and I miss you. Mumun 20:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad you were banned indefinitely. I always enjoyed your edits. Jecowa 03:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This account is indef-blocked but the user is not banned. His/her main account is User:Goguryeo and it is not blocked. --Kusunose 03:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wha?! Hairwizard=Goguryeo ? Is that correct? Goguryeo's user page says that Goguryeo doesn't use Hanja well, and it seems the talk page shows that Hairwizard and Goguryeo talked with each other.Mumun 15:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer not to believe it myself; unfortunately the checkuser situation means that we more or less have to take it on faith that this is true. I'm still hoping that someone (Goguryeo, for example) will pop in and provide a reasonable explanation.... but I'm beginning to wonder if both H and G were actually a certain perma-banned user, whose name I will not utter here, but who shared the same penchant for blending ancient Korean history with egregious sockpuppetry. -- Visviva 17:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, I hope this is not true. I second your hope that somebody will fess up. I followed the Goguyreo-Room 218-etc case at the checkuser situation but I must have missed the Hairwizard connection.

If this is true then we have been interacting with a lot of fake people over the past months. Creepy. If true, I question the sanity of the individual who did this. Additionally, I believe you may be right and this may not be the end (another banned user from long ago...who will be back or is already back as a new user). I know Wikipedia isn't a social networking site, but it counts on collaboration between individual editors. If this is true then there are implications for the relations between editors...oh boy. 머리가 아프네 Mumun 18:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

안녕하세요.

그냥 같은 한국사람인것 같아서 인사드립니다. Orthodoxy 20:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

삼조선과 Je State

내가 그동안 삼조선에대 엄청 많은 노력을 했습니다. 근대 고조선 패이지에는 꼼짝도 못하게 됬어요. 내가 삼조선을 늘려고 하면 항상 누군가 지우네요. 이일을 어찌하면 좋겠소? 그리고 Je state으는 우리 나라 말로 뭡니까? 난 한번도 들어 본적이 없어서요. --Kprideboi 01:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

qing dynasty

if qing were korean, why did they attack korea, make it pay tribute, force it into hermit kingdom, force them to erect a humiliating stelea in their honor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.241.53 (talk) 06:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Agency for Editing of Korean History

"The first regulation for Korean history compilation did not contain the history of Gojoseon (legendary: 2333 BCE–293 BCE) and succeeding several states after Gojoseon's destruction to validate their colonization because[citation needed] Japanese history (not pre-history) does not exist before 100 CE."

This sentence is written by you. Would you please show us evidence that Japan denied Gojoseon in order to "validate their colonization" and that it was "because Japan has shorter history than Korea"?--Michael Friedrich (talk) 05:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Je state

AfD nomination of Je state

An article that you have been involved in editing, Je state, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Je state. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Skyfiler (talk) 21:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daedong Sagang

The article Daedong Sagang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK. No indication of WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 19:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]