Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. The sources were all about HD Hyundai, hence WP:NOTINHERIT applies here.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chung Kisun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you for your feedback. Following your advice, I have omitted sections primarily focused on HD Hyundai and retained only those directly addressing the individual. Haileyworks (talk) 02:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Haileyworks!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!07:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
I agree with SafariScribe. There might be more coverage in Korean sources. I speak Korean so feel free to reach out if you need help.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chung Kisun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you for your valuable feedback. I wasn’t aware there was someone who could reference Korean sources on Wikipedia. Your assistance in validating his credibility through Korean media coverage is tremendously helpful.
As the owner and CEO of a Fortune 500 company based in Korea, his business activities are primarily focused in the region, and there is extensive coverage of his career and accomplishments from reputable, mainstream Korean media outlets. I have already located additional Korean sources to further substantiate his presence and influence in the industry.
I was wondering if I should simply resubmit the edited draft with these sources for your review, or if there’s another process I should follow. I would greatly appreciate your guidance on how best to proceed.
