User talk:Habibpc

Welcome!

Hello, Habibpc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Alias Flood 01:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naghle_zanane_sangi.jpg: What was wrong

You uploaded Naghle_zanane_sangi.jpg, claiming that This image is a screenshot of a copyrighted television program or station ID. As such, the copyright for it is most likely owned by the company or corporation that produced it. [...] To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as described on Wikipedia:Image description page, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.

You provided no fair use rationale for its use in Shiva Boloorian. It's 240kB large. And it is conspicuously overprinted with: © All rights reserved for Shiva Boloorian® SHIVABOLOORIAN.COM™ It's utterly incompatible with Wikipedia and I therefore deleted it. -- Hoary 07:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afd on Habibollah Allahdad

AfD Nomination Habibollah Allahdad

The article Habibollah Allahdad has been nominated for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habibollah Allahdad. Don't forget to add four tildes (˜˜˜˜) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Habibollah Allahdad during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. -- Peripitus (Talk) 13:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Habibpc. I don't think you read the above as you've blanked this page, the articles talk page and removed the deletion notice from the article. None of these edits are useful as the discussion on the article's future takes place in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habibollah Allahdad - Peripitus (Talk) 23:03, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. - Peripitus (Talk) 00:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought the problem was just solved

Hi, the articles for deletion process usually continues for 5 days ( longer if needed ) to determine the consensus view on how the article is treated. Note that although the process is called deletion the outcome is usually one of:

Delete - article is deleted

keep - article is kept as is

Merge - article is merged into another article

Userify - article is moved to someone's user page and out of the main encyclopedia

In this case, as the article is a biography, there needs to be assertion in the article that it meets the notability guidlines, which usually means that independant third parties have written primarily about the subject. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Habibollah allahdad.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Habibollah allahdad.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 15:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shiva-001.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shiva-001.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ponticello

A tag has been placed on Ponticello requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongomatic (talk) 14:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Habibpc! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Shiva Boloorian - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ARHAX.studio

The article ARHAX.studio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CORP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 17:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ARHAX.studio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ARHAX.studio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARHAX.studio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 21:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ARHAX.studio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ARHAX.studio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 03:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arhax-logo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arhax-logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]