User talk:HVulpes

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, HVulpes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Durin 17:33, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and thanks for the edit. HVulpes 19:17, 23 September 2005 (UTC)HVulpes[reply]

Elements in Pop Culture article move

I moved the Elements in Pop Culture article you created to Classical elements in pop culture. The orginal title was unclear, and did not correspond to the Classical element article's title. --Durin 17:34, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Seems I get to do a bit of mentoring here :-) Please take the time to add edit summaries to your edits in the appropriate text box below the main editing window. This is an important thing to do so that people who are following Special:Recentchanges have an easier time of conducting vandal patrolling. Also, if some day down the road you decide to nominate yourself (or someone else nominates you) to be an admin (see WP:RFA), having edit summaries is often viewed as an important element of qualification to be an admin. --Durin 20:25, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, so even minor edits need a notice. Check. But how detailed should it be? Is there a short hand that is used? HVulpes 20:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)Hvulpes[reply]
- Have a look at Wikipedia:Edit summary and Wikipedia:Edit summary legend. Those should help clarify. --Durin 21:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks again. HVulpes 21:21, 23 September 2005 (UTC)Hvulpes[reply]
    - I'm happy to help. If you need anything, please don't hesitate to ask me. --Durin 21:40, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Classical elements in popular culture

Classical elements in popular culture, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Classical elements in popular culture satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical elements in popular culture and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Classical elements in popular culture during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eyrian 19:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of female supervillains

The article List of female supervillains has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List is full of unsourced examples, many of which are not super-powered beings in the first place. List serves no function that would not be better served by a category.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edward321 (talk) 00:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Istishia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Istishia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Istishia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:55, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Worghest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Worghest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worghest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of D'hin'ni

The article D'hin'ni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 22:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oghma (Forgotten Realms)

The article Oghma (Forgotten Realms) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of female supervillains for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of female supervillains is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female supervillains (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Classical elements in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Classical elements in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical elements in popular culture (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

―Susmuffin ^Talk 13:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of female supervillains for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of female supervillains is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female supervillains (5th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dronebogus (talk) 09:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]