User talk:HTML CSS JS

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HTML CSS JS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now understand that I vandalized the site and I take it back. I promise to never do this again and that I can be trusted. When I was unbanned before, I forgot my account password and username so I had to create a new one and that was most likely misinterpreted HTML CSS JS (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Frankly, if you've managed to lose access to two other accounts in the space of a little over a month, I don't think you have the necessary competence to edit here. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that point, you'll need to explain what specific steps you have taken such that you'll be able to retain access to your third account. Yamla (talk) 21:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You continue to be disruptive through logged-out edits. This needs to stop immediately.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

@Ponyo: I'm sorry ! I thought people wouldn't care. Does this mean all hope of me being unbanned lost? I'm really sorry and promise never to do this! HTML CSS JS (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Not necessarily, but editing disruptively while logged out isn't helping you, of course editors care about any edits being made, especially disruptive ones or vandalism, but you shouldn't cause disruption to Wikipedia by trying to make a point, you've been told by multiple users that the Standard offer is your best option, meaning:

No edits to Wikipedia for 6 months
Not creating accounts or editing anonymously

You are free to contribute to other Wikimedia projects to demonstrate you have the competence to edit in a collaborative manner, once the 6 months has passed you are welcome to make another unblock request and explain why the block should be lifted. However the longer you keep making edits to your talk page you are resetting the 6 month timer with each edit. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 00:39, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. What if for some reason I can't go to other projects? Does that also decrease my chance? HTML CSS JS (talk) 00:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) You should be able to edit on other projects by creating an account on the specific projects website (probably best to use the same name as you're using here) and make edits there to demonstrate constructive edits. If you are unable to make edits then contact a user there or request admin assistance. Hope this helps. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 00:46, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was just asking if not editing elsewhere would decrease my chance of getting unbanned here. HTML CSS JS (talk) 00:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) It's possible, as you would need to be able to convince whichever administrator who reviews your request why you should be unblocked other than simply avoiding Wikipedia for six months. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 00:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Read WP:SO to learn more. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 00:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. I will try to edit other Wikimedia projects and stop myself from editing Wikipedia. HTML CSS JS (talk) 00:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(for 6 months) HTML CSS JS (talk) 00:59, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:HTML5, CSS3! per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HTML5, CSS3!. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 02:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]