User talk:Gzbernini

Welcome!

Hello, Gzbernini, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 23:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hi. I reverted your edit to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up, because it added self-published sources, which arent acceptable nor reliable as they have no editorial oversight, fact-checking, and can be held by anyone with an account. These type of sources include web blogs and Twitter; ChartNews was specifically addressed at the Reliable sources noticeboard. For Nielsen SoundScan's sales information, recommended sources are Billboard, HipHop DX, and SOHH. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nicki Minaj, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —MelbourneStar ☆^talk 23:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up, you may be blocked from editing. Diva Knockouts 15:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Magna Carta... Holy Grail may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* <nowiki>"Tom Ford" contains elements of "[[Bad Girls (M.I.A. song)| Bad Girls" by [[M.I.A. (artist)| M.I.A.]].</nowiki>
//www.amazon.co.uk/Magna-Carta-Grail-Limited-Edition/dp/B00DMRNMRQ |title=Magna Carta Holy Grail [Limited Edition]: Amazon.co.uk: Music |publisher=Amazon.co.uk |date= |accessdate=2013-07-04}}</

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:52, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to List of hip hop albums considered to be influential, we cannot accept original research. Original research encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source that explicitly say what your contributions are stating. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 01:27, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

M.I.A. singles

The discography article cites reliable sources which say that all those releases were singles. Here for example, is a source from a major UK newspaper which not only says that "It Takes a Muscle" was a single but also chooses it as one of the singles of the week. Here is Prefix magazine stating that "Bird Flu" was the first single from "Kala". Per WP:V, if reliable independent sources say the releases were singles, then they were. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Heller

Hello! Can someone PLEASE protect the page Timothy Heller (singer)? I created it recently. This page is about a rape victim and it's getting vandalized by fans of the allegedly rapist, Melanie Martinez. Please protect it.

Gabriel

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Gzbernini. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Hailey Wait. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 23:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colleen Green, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Hailey Wait

Hello, Gzbernini,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Hailey Wait should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hailey Wait .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

^{Atsme📞📧} 04:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Timothy Heller

Hello, Gzbernini,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Timothy Heller should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Heller.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

×º°”˜`”°º×ηυηzια×º°”˜`”°º× 19:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Mike Rinaldi

Hello, Gzbernini,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mike Rinaldi should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Rinaldi.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

×º°”˜`”°º×ηυηzια×º°”˜`”°º× 19:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gzbernini. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seymour Avigdor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seymour Avigdor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. LJF2019 ^talk 10:28, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seymour Avigdor

Hello, Gzbernini. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seymour Avigdor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samira Winter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samira Winter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samira Winter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 21:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Supreme Blue Dream for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Supreme Blue Dream is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supreme Blue Dream until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 02:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ethereality for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethereality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethereality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 02:07, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]