User talk:Gyrorobo

Welcome!

Hello, Gyrorobo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --EEMeltonIV 01:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mudflap

A tag has been placed on Mudflap (internet personality), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vaubin 01:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Jinmay

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jinmay, by Mattb112885, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jinmay is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jinmay, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Jinmay itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ori

Could you please tell me which episode mentions an Ori emperor? I don't remember one. Thanks. --Tango 20:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cult films

Please note that Category:Cult film is up for deletion since it is a recreation of a previously deleted category. This category, lacking any precise criteria for inclusion, will be axed. Please stop adding it to the articles. --EEMeltonIV 01:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hero races

Similar to Category:Cult film, I have nominated Category:Hero races for deletion because there are no concrete, objective criteria for inclusion. Categories tend to be used for fairly concrete aspects of an article, and I think the notion of what constitutes a "hero" or group of "heroes" is just too amorphous. However, there're five days until an administrator makes the decision, and you can follow that link to articulate a reason to keep it if you'd like. Thank you for your contributions. --EEMeltonIV 01:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Thanks for experimenting with the page Raimundo Pedrosa on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Jay32183 19:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yu-Gi-Oh! GX

Your edits to Martin Empire and Society of Light have been undone. The Society is a religious cult, and the Empire merely a group that were referred to by this name in only one instance. The two are in no way formalized governments. The Clawed One 03:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Ryp Bakura were also undone. Neither Bakura nor Dark Bakura were ever kings. The Clawed One 03:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Santa Claus page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Category:Fictional drug users

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional drug users, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Fictional drug users was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Fictional drug users, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 04:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why July 9 and October?

Why did you create categories for articles with unsourced statements since those dates in July and October? Do you realize that they even overlap because everything since October is since July? Doczilla (talk) 04:15, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:United States popular history

Category:United States popular history, which you have utilized, has been nominated for deletion.

If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –--Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Sody Pop

A tag has been placed on Sody Pop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 09:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Santa Claus worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Santa Claus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Santa Claus, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Thanks for experimenting with the page Vesper Lynd on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. _{El Greco}^(talk) 18:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa (Dexter's Laboratory)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lisa (Dexter's Laboratory), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Lisa (Dexter's Laboratory). Redfarmer (talk) 09:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lisa (Dexter's Laboratory)

I have nominated Lisa (Dexter's Laboratory), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa (Dexter's Laboratory). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Redfarmer (talk) 09:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel the article should not be deleted, you should comment with your reasons to the discussion in the link above. However, keep in mind the guidelines for fictional characters at WP:FICTION when formulating your reason. Redfarmer (talk) 10:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CFD nomination of Category:Fictional pretty girls

I have also nominated Category:Fictional pretty girls for deletion. The discussion is here. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the CFD notice from Category:Fictional pretty girls again. Bencherlite ^Talk 22:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in User talk: Redfarmer, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 10:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Lisa (Dexter's Laboratory). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 10:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with the page Vesper Lynd on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. _{El Greco}^(talk) 21:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Luke Skywalker, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 01:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You had your fun, now stop adding stupid categories to articles. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 01:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fictional cowards and worrywarts

Category:Fictional cowards and worrywarts, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon ^(Talk) 01:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Perry the Platypus

A tag has been placed on Perry the Platypus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 01:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Asmodeus

I have reverted your last edit of Asmodeus (Dungeons & Dragons) because I am convinced that it is not correct. Additionally, I do not think that the link to Satan, that you added, contributes to the subject, as Asmodeus in Dungeons & Dragons is, as the category of the article says, a fictional portrayal of Satan, while the link leads to Satan as it is portrayed in real-world religion. Asmodeus has, to my knowledge, never been reverred to as Satan in D&D. I would be happy to read your opinion. Daranios (talk) 14:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. --Flash176 (talk) 08:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:List of mad scientists

Category:List of mad scientists, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jinmay (SRMTHFG)

I have nominated Jinmay (SRMTHFG), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinmay (SRMTHFG). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 18:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 18:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Saint Nicholas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 16:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/YourLord, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Galactus Edit War Mediation

Hi. I'm trying to mediate an edit war over the Galactus article here. Can you chime in with your two cents? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Please, could you possibly be willing to add your input on the One-Above-All deletion discussion? A user, by the name of MBelgrano, is trying to delete the article, and now its image, apparently mainly because he is upset that no one supported his proposal to merge the article with Fictional portrayals of God. I have myself made many points on the article, such as comparing it with other comic portrayal of a Supreme Being, but Belgrano avoids addressing many points I have made, ignores my direct pleas for him to possibly consider or at least compromise, compares the One-Above-All with Batman and the Ultimate version of George W. Bush, and mentions irrelevant issues to the article, such as atheism.

This user seems to have nominated many articles for deletion in the past, and what bothers me the most is that, from his own comments, he plans on removing the article now because he feels personally slighted that other users restored much of the content he removed some time ago, and that some apparently disagreed with his choice to have the article merged. Thus, while the article may indeed contain some original research, he is using that as more of an excuse to attempt to justify this than as an actual reason. He does it more to satisfy himself rather than as an effort to help improve Wikipedia.

The article was made in 2006, and has lasted to this day, with overall hundreds of users having edited it. And now, because of a single user's tag, it is about to be permanently deleted. Not a single other person has chosen to have this article deleted and every day, according to the logs, hundreds still view it. And, what is more, many articles and templates link to it; even other language Wikipedias have this article. Please at least consider offering your own input on this, my friend. Aidoflight (talk) 02:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]