User talk:GypsySlide

Speedy deletion of Red Avalon

A tag has been placed on Red Avalon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Booglamay (talk) 21:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Lawler

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for the copyediting you did to Jerry Lawler. However, I don't think mentioning an entire date three times is necessary, and informal phrases like "family, friends and fans alike were treated to positive reports as Lawler was slowly being eased off sedation..." are less appropriate than merely saying, "Lawler was eased off sedation" or "Lawler was reported to be eased off sedation." Also, the passage about the angioplasty would be more streamlined as simply, "On September 11, 2012 he underwent an angioplasty to improve blood flow to his heart." For this reason, I made changes to this paragraph. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Auston Matthews

Please stop entering a line for the 2016-17 season to the Auston Matthews article. It's customary to add a season's stats for a player only after the end of the season, rather than during the season (where the numbers would have to be maintained over and over again). Thank you, PK T(alk) 13:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaving it for today, because I'm not going to run against the 3RR rule. Instead, I have asked other editors to get involved. PK T(alk) 14:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Auston Matthews. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Echoedmyron (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PK T(alk) 01:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Auston Matthews. – Sabbatino (talk) 10:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]