User talk:Guthroth

WikiProject Reenactment

Hello, I noticed you've been adding and editing content related to historical reenactment. Since the associated WikiProject is a bit lacking in activity because there's only so much every individual can know and add, I'd like to invite you to take a look at our current ToDo list and consider joining if you're interested in the subject matter. Feel free to add points to the ToDo list if you can think of anything that is in need of improvement.

Regards, Ashmodai 22:41, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Viking Groups Page

Hi

Regarding your comments, I never meant that I was the owner of the page, merely that it's very much a work in progress and I was asking that it not be marked for deletion, style, quality, or content until I am able to finish it

Pete Guthroth 12:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asking that nobody edits it, though, is inappropriate. If you don't want your work to be edited while it is in progress, prepare it offline or in a subpage of your userspace (here, for example), and then create the article when it's finished. Also, don't sign articles – signatures are intended to identify comments on discussion pages, since they generally aren't edited by other people, but since articles are edited freely a signature is inappropriate and misleading once an article has several edits. Thanks – Qxz 12:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pete,

I suggest putting the {{underconstruction}} template at the top of the article. Also, while you are actively editting it, add an {{inuse}} template.

--Kevinkor2 15:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Deletion: The Vikings Groups

Hi Pete,

Thank you for creating the article, The Vikings Groups. An editor has nominated it for deletion. He/she believes the organization, The Vikings Groups, does not meet Wikipedia's standards for notability for organizations and companies. Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vikings Groups and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

I encourage you to edit the article during the discussion to improve it; especially, to add references to reliable sources that "take notice" of the group. Such sources should be independent of the group and independent of each other. Newspaper and magazine articles that refer to the group will do nicely. In this way, The Vikings Groups will meet Wikipedia's standards for notability.

Please keep the articles for deletion template at the top of the article. Removing it will not end the deletion debate.

Happy editing!

--Kevinkor2 22:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Non-historical re-enactment groups

An editor has nominated Non-historical re-enactment groups, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-historical re-enactment groups and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Norstead:

Norstead:, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Norstead: satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norstead: and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Norstead: during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 01:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Wikipedia meetup in London

Wikimedia UK logo

Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008

Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map

More information: Wikipedia:Meetup/London 12

Hello,

I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.

If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Wikipedia enthusiasts in which we chat about Wikipedia and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.

The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!

Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!

Norstead: article

You seem to be the primary contributor to this article, so I wanted to mention to you that it should probably be moved; the colon shouldn't be part of the article name like that. My thoughts are either to move it to Norstead and include a disambiguation reference to the other Norstead, or to move it something like "Norstead (Missouri)". I can do the move, but I'm not entirely sure what location it should be moved to. cmadler (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I brought this up on the article's talk page, that's probably the best place to have this discussion. cmadler (talk) 17:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In truth the Colon was a mistake, and I've been meaning to sort it out. Norstead is already a disambiguation page, so maybe changing both articles to Norstead (Missouri) and Norstead (Newfoundland) is the way to go Guthroth (talk) 19:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved the article. The other Norstead has no article yet, so that's easy to change. cmadler (talk) 19:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Created Norstead (Newfoundland). If you can help me expand it just a bit, particularly with any news reports or such that you can find, I'd appreciate it! Thanks, cmadler (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://twiki.riteme.site/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. We would love to have you!

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 18:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Battlefield West Middlesex - The Background

http://grumpyviking.blogspot.co.uk/2011_04_01_archive.html
If that is your blog page, please how could I get messages to you privately? I tried to add a comment to the blog. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the scenario for a tabletop wargame, what was the result of the wargame? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Vikings NA

The article The Vikings NA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, no reliable sources found; only significant editors appear to have a conflict of interest

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:52, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]