User talk:Gurunithyan.Rahul

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bangalore Urban district has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bangalore Urban district was changed by Gurunithyan.Rahul (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89294 on 2018-05-07T13:12:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Thiruvananthapuram. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at New Delhi, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 14:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Thiruvananthapuram. - Arjayay (talk) 14:23, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bangalore Urban district, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 14:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Bangalore Urban district shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 15:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]