User talk:Guri.gogel
Guri.gogel, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Guri.gogel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC) |
Same user as Kambojharsangeet?
[edit]I noticed you're adding images by Wuestenigel/Marco Verch, something that Kambojharsangeet also does a lot. Do both these accounts belong to the same person? If so, have a look at Wikipedia:Multiple accounts for information on how to contribute without other editors suspecting you of sock puppetry abuse. Ibadibam (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm different but using images from Wuestenigel/Marco Verch. Please let me know if any issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guri.gogel (talk • contribs) 08:02, 29 June 2016
- I'm just curious, do you happen to know Kambojharsangeet? Or Marco Verch? Or Spsinghs? It's not a problem if you do; I'm just curious because of the similar work you're all doing. Ibadibam (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Castel Sant'Angelo may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- File:Engelsburg (23692378863).jpg|thumb|Castel Sant'Angelo side view]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- thanks, i updated same — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guri.gogel (talk • contribs) 11:40, 29 June 2016
- By the way, BracketBot is an automated program, not a human user, so it won't be offended if you don't reply to it
. Messages from bots can be deleted once you've fixed the problem they report. Ibadibam (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- By the way, BracketBot is an automated program, not a human user, so it won't be offended if you don't reply to it