User talk:Guregini

A kitten for you!

Welcome

Deror (talk) 10:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Guregini, thank you for disclosing a possible conflict of interest. If you have any questions about this or other aspects of Wikipedia editing, please feel free to ask or post for advice at WP:Teahouse, a forum for new editors. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 15:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Please help me with the approval of the page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Azure_Data_Explorer

Guregini (talk) 20:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This does not require an administrator, as any user can review a draft. You have submitted the draft and it is awaiting review. As there are thousands of drafts waiting for review by volunteers, who do so in no particular order, you will need to be patient. It can be weeks if not months. 331dot (talk) 23:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Happened to have spotted Draft:Azure Data Explorer. Unless Independent (WP:RS) sources are identified this is goinf to be rejected as all the sources are from Microsoft. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of connected contributor at Draft talk:Azure Data Explorer

I would suggest you reconsider your removal connected contributor under a WP:MINOR edit at [1]. If you believe I've made a mistake by all means ask a neutral at WP:TEAHOUSE to advise. Or explain why you had this connection on your userpage: Old revision of Guregini ? As a rule of thumb Wikipedia can work with connected contributors, though it is difficult. But don't simply try to cover the fact. You may have an explanation, and if people are telling the truth the community is generally sympathetic and can deal with it (but dont disclose personal information in the explanation). If you don't do anything I will likely add a comment to article talk page or take some other action. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention. I love technology, that's true, that's the connection Guregini (talk) 20:56, 21 March 2020(UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azure Data Explorer (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No WP:INDEPENDENT sources cited

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azure Data Explorer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Azure Data Explorer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 19:40, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guregini! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Kvng (talk) 19:40, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azure Data Explorer (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While the sources that were added were independent, they were self-published blogs, which does not speak to the standalone notability of the software.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azure Data Explorer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Azure Data Explorer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azure Data Explorer has been accepted

Azure Data Explorer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:23, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]