User talk:Gupta Dindayal

Welcome!

Hello, Gupta Dindayal, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Grayfell (talk) 06:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rootinfosol.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.rootinfosol.com

Speedy deletion nomination of Root Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Root Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. My Pants Metal (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mi Pay (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mi Pay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 06:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Gupta Dindayal, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Abdullah Alam (talk) 06:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Requested move is not for moves from draft or user space.
If you would like to submit your draft for review, add {{subst:submit}}to the top of the page.
Otherwise, see Help:How to move a page for instructions.
If you cannot move it yourself, see Requesting technical moves.

Proposed deletion of Good News TV Show

The article Good News TV Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:28, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mi Pay (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mi Pay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 20:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mi Pay (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There's no automatic inherited notability because of the parent company, and Wikipedia policy explicitly states no article or company, regardless of anything or anyone, gets an automatic notability because of the parent company; this, because it's also so new is only best mentioned at this time at the company's own article. The sources, regardless of anything or anyone, are in fact PR and republished PR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mi Pay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mi Pay

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mi Pay, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a rejected submission at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Denniss (talk) 12:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shekhar Juneja

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shekhar Juneja requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 08:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Is editing here part of your job? Are you being compensated in any way for improving articles here? Please respond to this before editing further. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prachi Garg

The article Prachi Garg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a problematic article tagged for multiple issues for months with no fixes; the subject fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. There's no assertion of notability that passes WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 10:11, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gupta Dindayal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I went through the editorial guidelines of the community including advertisement, conflict of interest and others. I apologize for my every instance that breached the terms. I'm grateful to the community members for keeping a watch and providing me with sincere feedback for improvement. Hereafter, I promise to abide by the code of conduct and maintain the sanctity of Wikipedia, which remains as the most trusted platform for millions of users worldwide.

Decline reason:

Based on the delayed and very evasive responses about undisclosed paid editing, there is no trust to be had here. I have no confidence that you will not continue to try and get around Wikipedia's terms of use by editing for pay in the future without disclosure. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Let's discuss things here before deciding on whether or not to unblock you. First, please answer the question I asked above. You've made two edits since I asked that, once at my talk page, and once in this unblock request. You did not answer that either in either edit.

The question is this:

Was editing here part of your job? Were you being compensated in any way for improving articles here? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I edited this to contribute my knowledge about app store optimization, and what I said, you can validate from any expert in the industry. It wasn't meant to seek any compensation from anyone. See my original texts:

Keyword Research

Keywords are term that users usually type in the search box or use in their voice search to find out information about anything on search engines. Marketers make use of standard tools like Google Keyword Planner, SEMrush, Semalt or similar tools to know find out the potential keywords. Special attention is paid towards utilizing the various text spaces including title, subtitle and descriptions. Every app distribution platform has its own algorithm and criteria to rank apps. It’s important for app marketers to use the relevant keywords in these spaces adhering to the text limits for each and convey the purpose of the app to the users. In addition to the traditional way of including screen shots, nowadays, app videos are added to. For media or visual content like images and videos too, there are text spaces like caption or title that marketers use to optimize their app for improved ranking.

However, if you think the reference citations or brands are not trustworthy or appropriate, you could have edited or asked me to do so. 07:27, 17 June 2018‎ Gupta Dindayal

Comment - @ Gupta_Dindayal, Nobody is doubting your expertise in SEO, App optimization or keyword research, and technical details of this internet marketing stuff is not being asked by Anna.. They have a simple question, Are you getting paid by someone for editing Wikipedia? How difficult is to answer that in a clear way? --Adamstraw99 (talk) 08:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ Adamstraw99 - i have already answered that question.

No, you did not. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try this again, for the last time:

Was editing here part of your job? Were you being compensated in any way for improving articles here?

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's neither part of my job nor do i receive any compensation. I have made around 100 edits, if at a few places it seems violating the policy in any way, I apologize for it, and assure you of nothing doing anything that goes against the community guidelines. Your mentoring and this discussion has taught me a lot and will help me to stay as a genuine contributor to share may knowledge. Thank you.

You wrote an article about Root Info Solutions. What about that? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's what i said - i apologized for being wrong at a few places, but that doesn't mean my other contributions were useless or promotional. Your effort to maintain neutrality is highly appreciable in this regard. Now, I have understood the purpose and spirit of Wikipedia better, though still learning, - and want to stay true to that. Looking forward to your guidance and support.

Okay. I've heard what you've had to say. Frankly, I think your evasive responses, and writing about an organization you work for makes your statement "...It wasn't meant to seek any compensation from anyone..." seem implausible. Plus, your other article creations and their tone makes me think that you are indeed here for reasons other than you say. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time.

Comment - As for the guidance and support WP:COI, WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE and WP:NOTHERE might help you to understand some basics about Wikipedia... --Adamstraw99 (talk) 11:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reference articles on guidance, I will go through them.

Nomination of Prachi Garg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prachi Garg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prachi Garg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:41, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CareKit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CareKit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CareKit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 21:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]