User talk:Gun23man/Archives/2019 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Gun23man. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, Gun23man, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Samuel Umtiti. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mattythewhite (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Help

If u want help come to me. Gun23man (☎️) 11:26, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sieng Chanthea (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DannyS712 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not just resubmit this draft (Special:Diff/900912537) without addressing the concerns.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sieng Chanthea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sieng Chanthea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DannyS712 (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Gun23man! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DannyS712 (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brawl Stars. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Per WP:VGSCOPE, do not add a list/table of brawlers and their gameplay stats. If you contest the changes, see Talk:Brawl Stars/Archive 1#Removing WP:VGSCOPE violations to discuss. Do not edit war. theinstantmatrix (talk) 22:44, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Brawl Stars - Brawlers table

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Brawl Stars - Brawlers table. theinstantmatrix (talk) 23:27, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sergi Roberto seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Huh how!!!! Ok I will stop! Gun23man (☎️) 14:06, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Marc-André ter Stegen, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 11:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel Umtiti. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sieng Chanthea (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Sieng Chanthea instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Already in mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sieng Chanthea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sieng Chanthea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 20:50, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: How to archive?

See H:ARC#Automated archiving for guidance on setting up automated archiving, this is what I use at my talk page. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi

My new page Gun23man (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Can plz someone help me in creating a new one? Gun23man (talk) 15:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 16:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gun23man/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look I’m sorry I done this for a joke do not take this literally honestly please forgive me I won’t do this again honestly this was a joke!

Decline reason:

This is #6 on the list of bad unblock request examples. Now that you know your fooling around will not be tolerated, you will need to explain what constructive edits you want to make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gun23man/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look at my edits they are standard quality I want to make good edits and stop vandals! Gun23man (talk) 17:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are done wasting our time, talk page access revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion and harassment as of October, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 10:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gun23man, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cabayi (talk) 09:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)