User talk:GulizSahdur

Please notice that your latest contribution to the article "Eastern Mediterranean University" [1]constitutes vandalism. See wikipedia instructions on vandalism [2]for further details. If you continue to make the same changes you can be barred from making further changes to Wikipedia articles.

You might also take into account that this article has already been the topic of discussion [3], and that if you wish to make radical changes to it you should make good scholarly arguments for their inclusion.

August 2008

Ahh yes people this is a perfect example of how 'knowledge' is gathered. Always question the validity of 'knowledge', always question the media it is so important because 'truth' seems to be twisted to fit people's interests. Can you imagine? Something which I know from my own experience that is not true is written as 'truth' as 'knowledge'. It is what is wrong in this world. Think people think for yourselves! Guliz Sahdur

Your experience is not good enough. What if I were to claim the opposite of what you said and called it "my experience"? Then it would be one person's word against another's. See the problem? --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 14:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Eastern Mediterranean University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please read the note I left on the mediation's talk page. Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 14:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed content from a Wikipedia article. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that is relevant to the article. You have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Eastern Mediterranean University. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Regrettably, I had to file an intervention request for your removal of sourced content. Please see the article's talk page for my proposal for a solution. Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 17:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-07-16 Eastern Mediterranean University. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This edit was made before the one Adoniscik warned you about above. However, do not attack other users in comments on talk pages or mediation. Additionally, it is bad form to add content to a closed mediation case, as you did today. —C.Fred (talk) 17:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Gulizcik for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 15:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration

As required, I am informing you that I am taking the recent discussion of EMU to arbitration. --2knowledgeable (talk) 05:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]