User talk:Guitarguy2323

Welcome!

Hello, Guitarguy2323! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! O3000 (talk) 01:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 01:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you don't like the truth.03:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Guitarguy2323 (talk)

Yeah! Everyone knows reality has a well-documented anti-Trump bias. Local Milk Person (talk) 23:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nah just lefties :)Guitarguy2323 (talk) 02:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

W. Bush

Hello! Please do not remove George W Bush from the Republicans who oppose Trump without a reliable source that denounces the New York Times article. Feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions. Happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 00:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spokespeople are not considered reliable sources. At most, we would note that a spokesman disputed the Times report. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of Republicans who oppose the 2020 Donald Trump presidential campaign, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LOL So if the New York Times said everyone should Jump off a cliff you would dispute that. So I guess the office of a president is no longer a reliable source :DGuitarguy2323 (talk) 01:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, this was not the office of the president. This was the Texas tribune reporting what a spokesman said. If you have a source citing a website of the president or something like that, then please bring it up. Your analogy is humorous but definitely is not what this argument is about. Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this clarifies it. I did not mean to discourage you from editing, but your continual deletion was not based on a reliable source. Feel free to continue to make constructive edits. Happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 01:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This [[1]] violates wp:npa, please reword it.Slatersteven (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

[2][3][4][5] Conduct like that is unacceptable, and Wikipedia does not allow people to continue to edit if they are only here to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, you are topic banned from the area of American Politics post-1932. You were alerted to discretionary sanctions months ago, so I assume this comes as no surprise. Your edits on Talk:Hunter Biden are evidence enough of your inability to edit in this topic area in a neutral and objective manner. You may appeal this sanction at WP:AE. Drmies (talk) 01:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Someone needs to call you out.Guitarguy2323 (talk) 02:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep talking like that and you might lose access to using your talk page. The only thing you should be doing here is to understand what you did wrong and apologize. Then appeal your block and promise not to repeat such behavior. -- Valjean (talk) 03:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NoGuitarguy2323 (talk) 21:14, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Guitarguy2323. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 05:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing (provocations resume yet again). In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

El_C 05:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]