User talk:Gtogrye

This is Gtogrye's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sculptural painting (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boomer Vial was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please expand the article, and be sure to add references in the form of inline citations to support the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sculptural painting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 11:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Gtogrye, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 11:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sculptural painting (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough significance and sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sculptural painting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 02:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello, Gtogrye. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:Sculptural painting, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:13, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sculptural painting (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The term "sculptural painting" has possibilities as a topic. It isn't that the expression is new or rarely used, it goes back at least to 1854, and has been applied to works produced as far back as the eleventh century. The problem is that it doesn't have a consistent meaning. See, for example:

Lady Marian Campbell Jervis-White-Jervis (1854). Painting and Celebrated Painters, Ancient and Modern: Including Historical and Critical Notices of the Schools of Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. Hurst and Blackett. p. 52.
Edith Weigle (May 12, 1957). "The Wonderful World of Art: Statues Share Show with 'Sculptural Painting'". The Chicago Tribune.
Clement Greenberg (1988). "Modernist Painting" (PDF). In Francis Frascina; Charles Harris (eds.). Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology. Paul Chapman Publishing. p. 7.
Michael Podro (1984). The Critical Historians of Art. Yale University Press. p. 144. ISBN 978-0-300-03240-6.
Bram Bogart (1986). "Sculptural Paintings". Leonardo. 19 (2): 113–116. JSTOR 1578272.
Sarah E. Betzer; Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres (2012). Ingres and the Studio: Women, Painting, History. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 64. ISBN 0-271-04875-1.
Saphora Smith (August 13, 2015). "Marc Quinn: Evolving as an Artist and Social Chronicler". The New York Times.
"Top 10 shows during Art Basel in Miami Beach". The Art Newspaper. November 30, 2016.

The draft is more a coatrack on which to promote the work of a random collection of mostly or entirely non-notable artists and galleries, rather than an encyclopedia article about an art term.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sculptural painting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 00:47, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sculptural painting concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sculptural painting, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sculptural painting

Hello, Gtogrye. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sculptural painting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]