User talk:GrudgeDragon

Welcome

Hello, GrudgeDragon, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

GrudgeDragon, good luck, and have fun. Aboutmovies (talk) 23:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GrudgeDragon, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GrudgeDragon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Unsourced production companies

Please stop making unsourced changes to production companies. In this edit, you added a citation, but these production companies were not in the source when it was added. The film has since been removed from the source (it's a constantly updated list), though there is probably an archived version of it available on the Wayback Machine. Unless you can provide some evidence that you found an archived version of the page that contains those production companies, I don't see how you can claim they were in the source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a followup, you can find citations for production companies at trade magazines (Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, Screen International, etc), reliable databases (the American Film Institute, Variety Insight, Baseline, etc), and at some of the other news sources listed at WP:FILM/R. I've been trying very hard to keep false information, speculation, and original research out of Wikipedia's articles on production companies, and it's too much work for one person. I don't know whether some random film was produced by MGM or Paramount. And, yet, people will come to these articles, claim that it is, and add it to the list without a source. I've been taking a more zero-tolerance policy toward this lately – it's too much work for me to research every change that's made to these articles. The burden of proof is on the person who adds the content, which means that you really should be adding citations when you add or change content on Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Alcon Entertainment. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at I Am Number Four (film). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking GrudgeDragon

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GrudgeDragon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry, but I really need to edit more on Wikipedia. I'm never doing it again and I must edit and put citations to reliable sources when needed. Please unblock me because I really need to contribute and edit here on Wikipedia. PLEASE!!!! Please unblock me. NOW! GrudgeDragon (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been confirmed as a sockpuppet of the blocked user, Alma Fordy (talk · contribs) and are therefore not eligible for unblock consideration. You must make the request on your original account. WP:UTRS remains open to you. Yamla (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.