User talk:Grosshigh

List of highest-grossing Telugu films

Grosshigh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Grosshigh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gross Collections

Hello Grosshigh. I'm Political Cricketer. According to the sources, if India Today is to be trusted, then there is no controversy in Gabbar Singh gross collections. But by watching the sources of Magadheera and Dookudu you cannot confirm which movie grosses 1 billion first. I think it's better not to mantain a section of gross, as Tollywood gross figures are not officially announced. PK^talk 05:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eega

Hi. I'm Political Cricketer. I noticed your comment in my talk page. Eega share collections are around 57 crores according to TOI. But it includes Tamil collections also. In the article only Telugu collections should be added which are around 42 crores. And coming to gross collections I'm not opposing that Eega's place in the list. But WWgross collections are some what unreliable. That's why I propose to delete it. Eega gross collections are around 125 crores according to some sources. If the column of WWgross is there, then Eega should be there. If the column is removed then Eega will not present in the template. Thank you. PK^talk 10:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 10:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify your "doubt", a sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term also refers to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community while pretending to be another person. In simpler words, the man who operated the blocked account User:Padmalakshmisx is now operating User:Grosshigh. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Padmalakshmisx (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 03:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seerat Kapoor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Seerat Kapoor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]