User talk:Gricharduk

Celebration!

	Celebration~!
	Wikipedia turns 20 today! Hope you are doing well and have a prosperous onwiki experience in the future. Once again, congrats for the GA. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 03:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Beryl May Dent

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beryl May Dent you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hawkeye7 That's fantastic. Thank you very much for reviewing Beryl May Dent - I really enjoyed writing about her. I really appreciate you taking the time and effort to review the article. I have addressed the comments at the top of the review - all really good points. Have a great day, Gricharduk (talk) 06:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the work you have done on the article. I had had not heard of her, and found the article fascinating. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Beryl May Dent

The article Beryl May Dent you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beryl May Dent for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Sidney Hill

On 20 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sidney Hill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that philanthropist Sidney Hill began a new life in England as a gentleman farmer, adding stables to the estate, a dairy and Langford Bullock Palaces for his prized shorthorn cattle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sidney Hill. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sidney Hill), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For an extremely well-written and researched biography of Dulcie Mary Pillers. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello. Thank you for contributing to my Wiki-Page "Sheiks of Siraj-ud-Din. It is greatly appreciated. Kind Regards Rodrigo Ottomanhistoria (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jane Ingham

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jane Ingham you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eewilson -- Eewilson (talk) 09:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jane Ingham

The article Jane Ingham you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jane Ingham for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eewilson -- Eewilson (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations, great job, and keep up the good work!

		The Bio-star
		Gricharduk, Thank you for the article about Jane Ingham. Not only did it hone my review skills, I learned about a fascinating woman biologist and got to work with a responsive and intelligent nominator. You took this article from non-existent to GA this year, which is an amazing feat! Great job, and I hope we get to work together again. Eewilson (talk) 07:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Eewilson, Thank you very much and what a lovely person you are. None of the above would have been possible without your thorough review, editing, advice, and hard work. I consider you joint author of the article as you improved it so much during the review. It has been a joy to work with you and you have taught me so much over the last week. Wikipedia is very lucky to have you. Have a great day, Gricharduk (talk) 08:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Grichard, Thank you! I will take a bit of credit, but you have been the one who took on this project and ran with it. You are now the Tupper-Carey expert. I only know the bare minimum! Eewilson (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

"Topicons"

Hi, Gricharduk! Did you know that you can put a topicon on your userpage for each of your good articles, DYKs, and featured articles? Just a nice little way to reward yourself and brag a bit. See Template:GA user topicon, Template:DYK user topicon, and Template:FA user topicon. —Eewilson (talk) 07:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Eewilson Thank you very much. No, I did not know about this template (there is so much I don't know) so I am going to add this to my userpage. Gricharduk (talk) 08:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Jane Ingham

On 10 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jane Ingham, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the English botanists Jane Ingham and Joseph Hubert Priestley were the first to separate cell walls from meristematic tissues in broad beans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jane Ingham. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jane Ingham), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

TFA blurb quick review

Hi, Gricharduk! Symphyotrichum lateriflorum has achieved FA status, and I have nominated it to be on the main page in a Today's Featured Article. A few people need to read the blurb and make suggestions if needed, and Support or Oppose, whichever applies. Would you be willing to take a look at the blurb, make any suggestions, comment if you have any, etc.? It is at this link: Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Symphyotrichum lateriflorum. Eewilson (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Morning Eewilson, of course! I will take a look now (it's a fantastic article). Sorry for my recent lack of communication, my current work project is getting in the way of what I love most - editing here :) I hope you are well, Gricharduk (talk) 05:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Internet outages are affecting me. Random cable modem/router reboots that began on Tuesday when Comcast, our ISP, had an outage in various areas across the nation. I suspect they are sending out packets that my "older" modem doesn't like. It's very annoying. :) Eewilson (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2024

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 Online events: New: Women who died in 2024 | Religion Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here Tip of the month: Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Articles expanded

Hello. I was wondering if you could help with a quick query regarding one of your expanded articles for Leslie Hood what source(s)/confirmation do you have that he is the same L Hood who took part at the Olympics? There is lots of detail in his biography, but I can't seem to locate anything that confirms they are one and the same. Thank you. 2A00:23C8:3091:9000:A78C:CDF8:BE2A:387F (talk) 18:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

In the 3 November 1900 edition of the Kenilworth Advertiser, Hood is named as one of the quarter backs in the Olympic squad. In that same report, his current team is stated as Rosslyn Park. Hoyer-Millar's book, Fifty years of Rosslyn Park (1929), also gives some biographical details on Hood (in the chapter 1896-1900), and various London newspapers (see the West London Obeserver), give his full name on some match reports. Gricharduk (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)