User talk:Grfr12345

Done^{[citation needed]}^[who?]^[when?] Not done

Grfr12345 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for visiting. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here. Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome!

November 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Qantas Flight 32, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:28, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Hello there. I noticed that you've create a page to run for adminship. I wanted to let you know, before you go any further, that candidates with less than a year's experience and less than several thousand edits almost always are unsuccessful at requests for adminship on this project. With less than 200 edits, your request is almost guaranteed to be closed as unsuccessful within a few hours. Please consider reading User:Sven Manguard/Failed RfA Advice, which contains a guide as to what the community is looking for in potential admins. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:36, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed reorganisation of specification data in Melbourne tram articles

I've proposed some changes to the was Melbourne tram articles are structured. I want to move much of the specification data out of the infoboxes and into a new section. I've raised a centralised discussion at Talk:Z-class Melbourne tram#Proposed reorganisation of specification data and was wondering if you have an opinion either way. I have also created a mock-up at User:Liamdavies/sandbox. As you've edited in the Melbourne tram area, your input would be appreciated so we can form a consensus, thanks for your time. Liamdavies (talk) 06:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]

December 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Reviewer, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. FunPika 02:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback on "E-class Melbourne tram"

Thanks for posting your feedback on "E-class Melbourne tram".

You posted this comment on 7 December 2013 (view all feedback).

We appreciate your contributions to this page!

Grfr12345 (talk) 09:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

I notice that you scarcely ever use edit summaries. It really is much beter to provide an edit summary for every edit, briefly indicating the nature of teh edit, as it makes it far easier for other editors to see what is going on in th editing of a page, and to track down edits relevant to what they are looking for. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Youtub

Hello Grfr12345,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Youtub for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lemonmelonsuperstar (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Fremantle99 would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Fremantle99 to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Grfr12345. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hello concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hello, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hello concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hello, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:26, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hello

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 22:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your rfa

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Grfr12345

Hi Grfr12345: I am not sure whether you realize the RfA has been transcluded. Also, although you have been here for a year, you have very few edits to run for adminship. Are you sure you want to go through with this? Yngvadottir (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Hi. I've closed your RFA because it is immediately apparent that it will not be successful. With 282 edits, and only a handful in the past year, you do not have the requisite experience. More importantly, however, you appear to be using account ZTE908 and passing it off as somebody else, a prohibited practice known as socking. Thanks, James^x12345 19:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sockpuppetry, ie: User:ZTE908. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grfr12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If I really was @ZTE908: then why wouldn't I request myself for adminship with @Grfr12345:? Also, if I was @ZTE908: then why would I request adminship on both accounts at the same time if I didn't want to get banned? Grfr12345 (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

These are good questions. Why did you? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Grfr12345 (talk)

Adminship

It is not wholly clear to me whether you seriously want to be an admin and fail to understand the due process involved, or if you are just playing around. If you are serious then please take notice that all of your edits remain visible permanently, whether they are blanked out or not, and as part of the RfA process reviewing editors will inspect them. submitting ill-informed applications, having already been advised not to, will significantly hinder any genuine application you make in the future, as will the creation of sockpuppets, for which you are currently blocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikicup

Join da Wikicup and fly the flag for Bosnia & Herzegovina. Aneditor (talk tome) 07:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Grfr12345. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Grfr12345. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trout

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Grfr12345. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]