Jump to content

User talk:Grey Shadow/Archive 01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

Hello, Grey Shadow/Archive 01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 00:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Your work on "Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe"

Hi Grey Shadow,

thanks for your help on the handbook article! I have a question to you regarding the dead (red) wiki-links:

I began linking all characters mentioned in the bibligraphy section to their own article. Though not all characters have an article yet, it seemes fitting to me, to link them all. But how linking to an article that still doesn't exist?

1. So I began to link the names only by adding brackets ("[["..."]]"), then looking if they all fit. If they were ambigeous then I added " (comics)|" or even " (Marvel comics)|". So also every dead link only has " (comics)" at the end if it will be definitely ambigous if someone creates that article (or the article without any extention, mostly a disambigeous page, already exists). Otherwise there will be only the brackets.

2. The dead links you added are always with extention (" (comics)|..." or " (Marvel comics)|..."). I "fixed" some of them earlier, because I think all dead links should be at the same format. Now you added so much more (thanks!), so I want to reach a "convention" for the site on how the format should be, before I'll edit the article again.

So there are two methodes (1. and 2., see above) on how to handle the format of dead links.

Pro for the first: It's cleaner!

Pro for the second: It's more likely that a new article about e.g. "Zaran" will be named only "Zaran" and therefore the link of the first methode won't fit. (Of course there could also be new articles WITH extentions (although not nesseccary), but that's more unlikely).

Now what do you think?

Greetings

Weapon X (de) 11:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


Hi Weapon X (de),
I'm happy to go with option one.
I think that I added the (comics) to some of the named links as I was just continuing on from the previous entry and was distracted by something here while I was editing.
I'll see if I can find some information to allow me to write something for some of the redlinks after more sections are done.
Does that make sense to you? Grey Shadow 12:17, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


That's fine with me! Thanks! Weapon X (de) 13:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels

Hi thank you for joining the WikiProject. There is still plenty of scope for influencing things and making your contribution count. We are about establishing standards for Novel based articles and writing articles that meet our own and others high standards, and to improve Wikipedia's diet of articles on Fiction books, otherwise called Novels. If you have any questions, do ask. Please be very welcome. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 14:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Response to question here

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Novels/GeneralForum#Infobox_Preceding_Book as the location you placed was really just for discussion of the project page - general discussion goes here - response found after question. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Send for the Saint

I reverted your category change on this one book because it isn't consistent with the 52 other books in this series which are all listed under the "19XX books" categories which are more widely populated than the "19XX novels" categories. Technically speaking this particular book is not a novel anyway but a novella collection; Novels WikiProject allows these and short story collections to be part of the project. 23skidoo 12:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Grey Shadow 13:28, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Novels WikiProject Newsletter June 2006

Here is a new initiative for our project. You are recieving this as you have at some point signed up as a "member" of the project. Have a look at the newsletter via the link and see what you think. The June 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Novels vs. Books

If you haven't already, you might want to bring up this issue at the Novels Wikiproject forum page, as it might stop people from automatically categorizing things Year:Books which incidentally was what I was told to use and not Year:Novels which is why all the fiction book articles I've created use Year:Books. If there has been in fact consensus to change the categories to novels (and similar to the Saint situation above I'm seeing things are a bit hit-and-miss right now, for example some James Clavell novels are in one and some are in the other category) you might want to consider setting up a Bot to save yourself a lot of legwork. 23skidoo 15:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Obviously you're part of the Wikiproject too -- just wanted to make sure there was consistency. And if you can get a Bot going, it'll save you a lot of time changing everything over. 23skidoo 00:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

New MoS for dab pages

Hello,

About your good work on dab pages, please see the new MoS about them at WP:MOSDAB (especially: no more bold for the keywords). I noticed it because I was just reformatting "Love and War" and various collateral pages, and got an edit conflict with your revision, which followed an outdated format:

Also, after editing a dab page, and if you have some time for it of course, it can be a good idea to check its "What links here" (from the toolbox on the left): most of the pages linking to it are in error and should have their link disambiguated.

-- Regards, 62.147.113.190 07:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Noted. Thanks for the heads up. Grey Shadow 07:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Years 1900 to 1961 done

Seems to me this is a sterling peice of work. I don't have too much of a handle on how many articles that envolved. Would you be able to estimate haw many article you have worked on for this. My guess would be that there are more and more articles as we get closer to the present. Regards and thanks. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I lost count at 1,000. Grey Shadow 09:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Novels WikiProject Newsletter July 2006

Here is the new edition of our monthly newsletter. The July 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 14:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

An image that you uploaded, Image:Torm symbol.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Michael Bauser 00:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

regarding your talk page question...

Please don't strike things out as they mess up the auto reoganization program. (with 1000 articles... we realy don't want to have to do this manually!!! :) Just thought I'd drop you a note. Any comments on improving the list is welcome. Things like new criteria. (should we list items needing a image?, look at {{infobox book}}'s fields for more ideas!

Oh and thanks for working on this list!!! Eagle talk 23:59, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I responded on the incomplet novel list talk page.

I like your idea on the image thing... unfortunatly it won't get done untill next week. (I am going to make a new version of the current list today) Just posting to let you know I responded, (respond on relevent talk page as you have been doing) Eagle talk 01:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Cat: year novels

The short answear: yes.

Before I can do so I would need to know how we are going to find these novels. Are we going to search category by category? Could we incorporate this idea into the Incomplete infobox list and in doing so find the novels by looking in the "what links here in the book infobox template. (more infomation can be found in the provided link.)

In short, I would like to see how you would like it done compared to how I think it should be done, and come up with something that is better than the sum of it's parts. (once we decided on a methed, making the list is a simple affair.

Thanks for suggesting a new functionallity!!! Eagle talk 14:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Sorry about the spelling mistakes :)

WOW!! great idea's!

I like the sound of your second idea as well! (please look at the 3 existing autolists to make sure that you are suggesting new things I think you are)

Please keep them comming. I am working on your first idea right now... plus I am adding some new features. Such as "truely" sorted lists (in alphabetic order), plus some inhancments to the "isStub" / "notStub" indicators

Let me think a bit on your first idea. (I might make it an indicator like the "isStub" "notStub" indicators are now. then all lists that I make will check for the existance of "yyyy novel")

Please please keep sending me new idea's to enchance these lists! The sky is the limit! –Eagle talk 16:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

P.S. can you elaborate on the second idea... to program it I need to be 100% clear on what you mean... Thanks.

New isStub functionality

Bug fixed!

Can you have a look at my Sandbox and tell me if the criteria for the "isStub" / "isNotStub" is set to a optimal location. The criteria are:

  1. To be marked "isStub" in bold, it must have less than 450 words (minus the number of words in a template i.e. words in a {{Infobox Book}} are not counted) and the article is not currently in a stub category.
  2. To be marked "isNotStub" in bold, it must have more than 450 words (minus the number of words in a template i.e. words in a {{Infobox Book}} are not counted) and the article is currently in a stub category.
  3. To be marked "isStub" in normal text, it must have less than 450 words (minus the number of words in a template i.e. words in a {{Infobox Book}} are not counted) and the article is currently in a stub category.
  4. To be marked "isNotStub" in normal text, it must have more than 450 words (minus the number of words in a template i.e. words in a {{Infobox Book}} are not counted) and the article is not currently in a stub category.

Let me know if any of the "word count" criteria should be changed up or down. Thanks! Eagle talk 16:17, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Auto worklists

Just so you know, All 3 current autoworklists are created and updated by me. If you want or need improvements to any of them, please come to me or post on the talk pages of the list pages. Eagle talk 17:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Your first feature has been added

Please look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Book to novel autolist#Category:Book stubs to see a working implentation of your idea. Comments on improvement is welcome!

Note, soon I will also have a seperate list dedicated to your first idea. A sample of this can be found at my sandbox as usual!. Right now I need to make sure that the project is ok with my new addition :) Eagle talk 22:10, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
A new entry for this list will be generated each time I run a search for any other autolist!!! Trust me you will have enough work!!! Eagle talk 22:10, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

2nd idea

I think we already have a list that does that :) have a look at this Book to Novel list. By no means have all the categories been searched... but it is a start on your idea. (yes I know the page name says it only does stubs, that will change as soon as I get permission to move it.) Eagle talk 01:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Novels Collaboration of the Month

You supported The Mystery of the Yellow Room, which has been selected as the Novels WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article towards featured article standard. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Just about got this up and running. If you can please get envolved. thanks :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/autolist/Missing YYYY category

The title is a link to the prototype of your first idea. Tell me if this is what you were looking for!

I am working on a list that will identify (book) -> (novel) articles that need moved. (this is your second idea). Eagle talk 17:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks... just one thing :)

I keep losing your posts! can you please post in a new section so it appears at the bottem of the page. Else I have to look through my history to find where you posted! Thanks!

P.S. Let me know more about your second idea. Please give me what you want, i.e. what results are you looking for. (the more exact you are the easier it is for me to do as computers love specific instructions, and I hate vauge criteria... as I aways do exactly what you don't want!) Thanks for your efforts!) Eagle talk 00:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Grins :)

Ah! ok I finally got it! What you want to do is very easy. All I need to do is if a article is a contians selected keywords and the title has {book} in it, add it to a new list.

Tell me if I am correct! thanks Eagle talk 01:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

is that a bug?

Are graphic novels considered novels? If so, YYYY books is not correct. Please clarify, as I thought graphic novels are included... but if they are not it won't be the first time I made a bad assumption! this this is just too big to know everything! Eagle talk 03:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I know who to ask!

Try one of these two. (I think they should be in the novel category... but if not then that is less work for me in the long run!)

  1. User:Kevinalewis -- I think you have met him. If not he is one of the primary people who keeps WP:NOVEL running.
  2. User:Pegship -- She is a librarian who's interest is in both films and novels. I have found her to be an authority in categorization. I list her second only becuase she is away right now (as far as I know), and you are likily to get a faster response with Kevin. Do note, she is my number 1 "goto" person for issues like this!

Hope that helps a bit! Eagle talk 04:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Graphic Novels

Re: User talk:Eagle 101#Follow on from Cat:year novels and User talk:Grey Shadow#is that a bug?

A question for you. Would you place something like 24: One Shot, a Graphic Novel, in {cat:Year novels} or leave it as it is in {cat:year books}? Grey Shadow 08:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Based on our project brief I would exclude them - they are considerably different animals than any textual novel, something half way between a comic and a novel. We deal in Novels and Novella (or Novelettes). Other raise short stories and being out of scope. In my veiw that is a hard one to see the borders of. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Further thoughts, this is such a rich area my view is that it would support a whole new WikiProject, that is if there isn't already one in existance for them. I vote for leaving them as "books" unless there are appropriate "Graphic novel" stubs and categories. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Kevin about the WikiProject potential, but for now I would cat the item under both Category:Graphic novels and Cat:YYYY novels Cat YYYY books. simply because the book is fiction no matter what the format. Just my own opinion and not policy. If/when some guideline is decided, it will be easy to find articles with both headings and edit them accordingly. Hope this doesn't muddy the waters further - ♥ Her Pegship♥ 17:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Kevin makes a good point back on Eagle101's talk page. Not all fiction works are novels, but all novels are fiction. In library terms, a comic book is not a book, but a periodical. OK, I revise my opinion & concur that they should go under {cat:YYYY books} for now. ♥ Her Pegship♥ 17:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Boogiepop and Others (novel)

I'm doing some Category's for novels at present, and wasn't sure if this is a novel, book, manga, graphic novel, or something else? Grey Shadow 06:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

It is a light novel. It is already categorised under 'Boogiepop', which is a subcategory of light novels (light novels being a subcategory of novels), so is probably fine as-is. Elric of Grans 06:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Novels WikiProject Newsletter August 2006

Here is the new edition of our monthly newsletter. The August 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I've listed a number of images you uploaded on WP:CP, because they are sourced to the Wizards.com website.A July 6, 2006 WP:CP discussion established that images taken from the Wizards.com website do not fall under the fair use provisions of promotional material. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems if you know that the images are legally usable on Wikipedia. Thanks and regards. --Muchness 01:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Novels

As one our most regular (and faithful) editors - wondered if you could do me a favour. I am about to be taking a real world break (from this Friday, for about 15 days) - I was wondering would you be able to keep an eye on the WP:NOVELS pages for me and respond to any enquires and questions etc. That would be a big help. I'm sure others will be contributing as well, but just to make sure, thanks. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for agreeing to do that - it'll be in good hands I know. Be in touch when I get back. Thanks :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 13:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Just to let you know I'm back from my travels. Plenty of work to do here - so may not be quite to productive here as recently but anyway thanks for watching the shop. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

hello again, Kevin. Oh well, Grey Shadow, let me know what I can do to help on my talk page, ok? Please. Lady Nimue of the Lake 11:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Novels assessments

  • Not sure if you can help with this one, but I thought I'd give it a shot: I've done a number of assessments of novels in the past couple of days and put comments so that other users would know why I gave the rating I did. Some comments appear as I presume they're supposed to (e.g. check out the Bleak House talk page, whearas some do not (e.g. Talk:Prochain épisode). It seems that another of these last now show the comments but didn't before. Maybe it's just a matter of time to update? I'll let you know if I run into any more problems.
preceeding unsigned comment by User:Ibis3

Erast Fandorin

Hi, as fellow WP:NOVELS member, could you please take a look at Erast Fandorin? I've totally revamped the article, added sources etc. Do you think it would stand a chance of becoming a Good Article? If not, what would be needed? Thanks very much. Errabee 15:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestions! Errabee 11:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Novels Collaboration of the Month

As a Collaboration contributor last month don't forget to have your say on what we have a go at next month - as this is only a day away. I don't want to be the only suggesting novels for this! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Novels newsletter

This month has scorched by and I have not been about most of it. If you have anything to say for this month's newsletter, even if a minimal message please update Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Outreach/Newsletter September 2006, thanks. Please think about this as a regular mouthpiece for the project. Also alter what you think is needed. The last two items I have carried over and could do with replacing or reworking! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

And Quiet Flows the Don

You're quick of the mark with this one - great stuff - I hope to get my two penny worth in gear later today. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Original language was Russian. Major novel in Russia, and worldwide. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 12:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV (September 2006)

The September 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 12:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

AWB

hi there! i've noticed an edit to the article Alcoholism using AWB. the edit itself [1] is extremely minor - just some spacing really. i've noticed similar edits glancing over your edit history, like this one [2]. AWB isn't meant for such small edits; each time you save an article it produces and write/read cycle server side that can be taxing in large quantities, and in this case for seemingly trivial reasons. talk to Martin if you want to get some more low-down on this kind of thing. cheers. JoeSmack Talk(p-review!) 15:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 2nd.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Volume 2, Issue 40 2 October 2006 About the Signpost
New speedy deletion criteria added News and notes
Wikipedia in the news Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View RSS Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Issue V - October 2006
Project news
  • Our project has been working on novel articles for sometime now and has just passed the 4000 articles tagged as part of the project. Already we are on 4441 as of today.
  • The /Assessment department has been making progress with discussions on the top priority level of novels. These are those articles that should be present in any version of this encyclopedia.
  • The "Members" list has been modified (preparatory to removing the inactive ones to an archive or "inactive" list).
Member News
  • The project has currently 142 members, 16 joined & 0 leavers since the last newsletter at the start of September 2006.
From the Members

Welcome to the fifth issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more envolved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk), Initiating Editor

Auto list news
  • Those working on auto generated lists have been a bit quiet recently. However there have been some work done on the /NovelsInCompleteInfobox list, focusing on adding those missing "genre" entries - however after being rerun today after a 2 month gap the number of articles selected has gone up from 1049 to 1172. We need help to ensure the informatin gets added to the infoboxes.
Collaboration of the Month
Current debates
Newsletter challenge
  • The first person to start the article is mentioned in the next newsletter. This months' article is Liponym.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 22:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Novels infobox additions

Thanks for your input on these. please don't forget to add talk page {{NovelsWikiProject}} {{Novelinfoboxincomp}} entries or something like them as appropriate. Thanks :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 14:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

The first thing to do would be to get hold of the "King" watsit, plugin mentioned on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/GeneralForum when he announced it. It's not that hard to use but a little querck in places. Once you have it it give it a go and leet me know if you have any issues. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 9th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Volume 2, Issue 41 9 October 2006 About the Signpost
Interview with Board member Erik Möller Wall Street Journal associates Wikipedia with Grupthink
Account used to create paid corporate entries shut down Report from the Portuguese Wikipedia
News and notes Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 16th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Volume 2, Issue 42 16 October 2006 About the Signpost
Wikipedia partially unblocked in mainland China $100 million copyright fund stems discussion
Floyd Landis adopts "the Wikipedia defense" as appeal strategy News and notes: Logo votes begin, milestones
Wikipedia in the news Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 23rd.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Volume 2, Issue 43 23 October 2006 About the Signpost
Report from the Finnish Wikipedia News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones
Wikipedia in the news Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Grey_Shadow/Archive_01&oldid=1143032752"