User talk:Greta chapman101

July 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Conseil du Commerce de France, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:07, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicholas Wright (academic). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nicholas Wright (academic) was changed by Greta chapman101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.985155 on 2018-07-02T08:07:47+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:07, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Nicholas_Wright_(academic). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 08:10, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Greta chapman101

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Greta chapman101, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 08:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Greta chapman101

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Greta chapman101, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 09:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]