Ok, just so I understand, you have a higher authority than Nawlin, yes? I'm new to Wikipedia, but the whole point of working with him was to weed out all the biased/promotional content since I wanted to follow Wikipedia's policy. According to him, that has already been done as you can see in his notes on my Talk page. I also had several people who have nothing to do with Foursquare Day read the article as well so they could tell me whether or not it sounded like an advertisement or written from a neutral point of view. Not one person said "advertisement." Therefore, perhaps you would like to explain what part reads this way so we can get it taken care asap. Thanks in advance. --Q-cue (talk) 02:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the info. I guess my initial concern is that Nawlin said the article no longer had a promotional/advertising tone, yet you are saying otherwise. In my opinion, you both have different opinions which is why I am asking who has authority. You're telling me one thing and he's saying everything is fine. DO you see where I am coming from? See me problem? He didn't just help bring it to a level to avoid speedy deletion, he had me edit all the content that was promotional. Furthermore, he stepped in and edited some himself so I could move it to the article space. Now, if he felt there was any advertising/promotional tone he would have added the "advert"tag himself like you did, no? Yes, I agree, we should discuss this on the article's talk page, but if we do, you will not receive a message. Instead, you will only see this message if you visit the page yourself. Anyway, please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Q-cue (talk • contribs) 02:35, 30 April 2010
Ok, that sounds good to me. I'll keep further discussion on the talk page. Btw, I'm not sure if you can or not, but since we already brought it to a level to avoid speedy deletion, perhaps you could remove this line "For blatant advertising that would require a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic, use to mark for speedy deletion." Have a good night and thanks again, Gregg! --Q-cue (talk) 02:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have reviewed you. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to leave them here, there, or on my talk page. Also, it appears that you were never officially welcomed, so I'm dropping a welcome template below. Happy editing! PrincessofLlyrroyal court02:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, GreggHilferding! Thank you for your contributions. My name's PrincessofLlyr and I just wanted to say hi and Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of the world's largest encyclopædia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name, the date and the time. If you are already loving Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field every time you edit. Again, welcome, and happy editing! PrincessofLlyrroyal court02:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
