User talk:Greenman2020

.

Adoption accepted

Done You are now my adoptee. You can replace your "seeking adoption" template with {{adoptee|ZooFari}}. I will be checking your contributions from time to time and seek out what you need improvement on. You may ask questions at my talk page in the meantime. Zoo Fari 21:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rivers and streams

Hello, please keep cool. Admittedly, these all aren't exactly Mississippis, but all streams and rivers are referenced by the official page of South Tyrol. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to slow down a little

Easy, easy... You report a fine editor for vandalism[1] and plaster vandalism tags on his (and other people's) perfectly alright articles. You might want to slow down a little. I also suggest you strike the warnings you put on Gun Powder Ma's page, just for good measure... Yintaɳ 23:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions Log- ZooFari

Hello Greenman, I see you have been very interested and vandal tools and editing. So far, you need alot of improvement before using the tools. Here is your first log. Logs help you understand to realize your mistakes to prevent in the future.

Article	What you did	What went wrong	What should have been used
The Big Hibachi	Inappropriate tag; marked as test	This was not a test. Tests include things that you would say "Ok, the page creation worked for you. Now it is time to delete it.". It is usually things that should have been used at the sandbox. The article was written somewhat encyclopedic too.	A better tag would have been G1 (patent nonsense). Even though the tag is not eligible for hoax, it did include sillyness that went to far. The page has now been deleted.
A Logician Devil - Lucifer. Illustration for Dante's "Divine Comedy"	Innapropriate tag; marked as test	Same as above	The Lead section was correct and introduced the article correctly. However, it has a long title with unnecessary phrases. Perhaps a move would have been well suited for this.
Pokemon ruby version season 1 2009	Appropriate tag	Nothing	Nothing (you marked the article with the correct tag)
Kitty's Back (Malcolm in the Middle) And Saldurbach	PROD	The PROD was inappropriate and unexplained	Nothing, the articles didn't have problems regarding our policy
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism-- Be careful with this! Though you didn't have a problem with this, you should know that the user should have enough evidence for reporting. This means that the contributions of that user have repeated vandalism. If only 1 edit was vandalism, do not report (yet).
Samantha Taylor	Marked Speedy for banned user	Nothing, but there are several reasons not to mark it speedy deletion. Even though the article might have been created by a banned user, the article was useful.	Leave it alone in case other users make corrections
Head tube angle	Marked G6	Not the better tag	This is where PROD is better to be used. You can PROD articles that were created for neologism (a definition of a word) and give the explanation as "Neologism; Wikipedia isn't a dictionary")

East Hill Church

Speedy was declined. There's now sufficient context. Zoo Fari 04:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copa Macaya

Unformatted articles should not be PROD, as they can easily be fixed. Consider placing {{wikify}} or {{cleanup}} at the top of the article instead. These display a message telling users that it needs proper formatting. If you have Friendly enabled, these and other tags can be placed in articles easily by selecting the "tag" tab at the top of the article. Zoo Fari 05:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tawhiri walsh

There is no nonsense in this article. Nonsense includes stuff like ";ldjgdgfvz;" or ridiculous things. A better tag is "unremarkable person". Zoo Fari 05:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Murapai

Any reason why you reported Murapai? The user contributions seem okay to me. Zoo Fari 03:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, never mind, after checking the user's talk page. You did the right thing :-) Zoo Fari 03:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions okay

Your contributions are okay tonight. All your speedy deletion requests were taken action by an administrator, showing that you correctly tagged the articles. Thumbs Up! I will be going off Wikipedia now and will be on tomorrow afternoon. :-) Zoo Fari 03:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Por supuesto que sí!

Of course I can help you, though I can't guarantee you can create one as professional as some users around here. It takes strong skills of tables, templates, and transclusions. You will eventually learn these, and I will help you improve your template skills :) Lets start by reading through the User page design center. There are many useful things that can get your userpage in good shape. I won't be staying up tonight, so if I don't reply, than I will probably be sleeping :) (Also, it is good to have someone to use spanglish with, I also use Spanish) Zoo Fari 03:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppet

{{sockpuppet}} Per your edits and behavioural patterns, including similar first edits, userpage and urge for adoption, I have blocked you as a sockpuppet of Cutlerowns19 (talk · contribs) (see also case and socks). PeterSymonds (talk) 00:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]