User talk:Grazia11

Welcome!

Hello, Grazia11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -Will Beback · † · 09:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grazia11 -- Seeing as how you speak both German and English, I was wondering if you might be able to correct some of the errors of fact contained on the German entry of Hawkins. For example, I do not believe his attending Columbia University has ever been verified. However, his BS, MD and PhD sources are known. Might you add this and other correct information to the German article? --ArtAsLife 01:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Art, the German entry on Hawkins is incomplete. there is no hype in Germany re Hawkins, he is hardly known there. I'll see what I will do. rgds --Grazia11 11:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. -Will Beback 06:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Will, sure enough, so much was/is in disorder that i was sloppy referring changes, minor and smaller. hope to keep up in future. rgds --Grazia11 06:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be much appreciated. Otherwise editors can't tell what the purpose of edits was and have to look at them to figure aout what's being changed. Cheers, -Will Beback 06:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's the story?

You haven't made any comment about the Wal-Mart quote. Frankly, I'm dismayed by it. What's the story? How did we get this misquote and it's subsequent misinterpretation? Why did you write a special note endorsing it and requesting special treatment for it? I'd like to make sure that you understand the aims of this project. Wikipedia's "Five pillars" When each of us edits here we are working for the project, not oursleves or our other affiliations. We all need to check our "hats" at the door and wear instead only the hats of Wikipedia editors. Outside of this effort we all have our personal opinions and beliefs. Yet all editors need to write verifiable, neutral material. If there's anything about that which you don't understand then feel free to ask me or another experienced contributor. Please let me know that you understand why the Wal-Mart quote matter is not helpful for Wikipedia. -Will Beback 09:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Email

I am having trouble with the feature. Please email me at art_as_life@yahoo.com Regards, --ArtAsLife 01:55, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

I'm not sure what you were intending to do, but it looks like you deleted some comments from the Talk:David R. Hawkins. Was that intentional? Do you need help restoring the deletions? -Will Beback 04:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G11, I am having trouble locating where you placed the dialogue from Rob, and regarding the Tucson conference. Would you please direct me to the location of this discussion? Thank you, --ArtAsLife 16:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grazia11, I got your reply but I don't understand it. What is "page 2"? Do you want to archive some material? I'll go ahead and restore the material and we can start again from there. -Will Beback 23:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to help fix accidental deletions of comments, but I'm concerned by intentional deletions. Why did you delete this comment? [1] Also, while I'm here, please note that en.Wikipedia has slightly different "style" standards than those of other languages, especialy regarding quotations marks. Please follow WP:MOS. Cheers, -Will Beback 12:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi Wbb Why did you delete this comment?

1) easy WBB, going back to your comment on wiki:talkpage and calibrations. you said wiki is not based on calibrations. this is comment is of no use for discussion, a personal opinion, and part of off-comments, which are not coinciding with "no general" discussion on the subject's article.

2) i've read the part on quotations - in the main article i may well abide to this. in the talk page i'd rather go by german usus in italics. it's easier to differentiate.

3) any news from the office of D. Hawkins on the question whether he issued the letter on talk page 1 re Carroll? --Grazia11 15:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't selectively edit the comments of others. It is very poor form. See Help:Talk page#Basic rules for all talk pages. I mentioned the quotation marks because you are using them in the article as well. I haven't heard from anyone at the office. -Will Beback 17:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi Wbb, does that mean - edit the comments of others generally?

i accept the basic rules and they make sense. and they are not the only policy.

you are not aware of the email cons with an outside party who objected strongly against selective presentation (as an ammunition for a certain agenda only, subverting other information deemed important) of his private email comments on the talk page. i had claimed basically the same of AaL earlier, which he had refused right out to do. in the end though he'd corrected it in sync with the 3rd party.

AaL has stated several times that he is willing to stick to the rules, which he is still learning (same as me). he diverted again - in writing this unneccessary 'legitimate joke' comment right after promising good manners. that's life. unfortunately he has not shown much respect and diligence in certain matters and with certain persons. that's life also. and wiki talk page will take care to preserve all the unimportant and misleading comments. good to know. --Grazia11 22:52, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We're all still learning the rules. Let's be patient with each other. Cheers, -Will Beback 02:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

regarding “...“:
meanwhile i have revised all quotations in article's with the applied US wiki standard. while doing so i could see several quotes in italics which have been inserted before i entered the scene. I took their example as expression of wiki standard. --Grazia11 04:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

Hiya, to pick a category, I recommend looking at other articles about similar subjects. If you scroll to the bottom of the article, you'll see that it's in a number of categories. If you click on "edit" for that page, and look at the bottom, you can see the exact syntax, which will look like [[Category:<name>]]. I recommend copy/pasting appropriate categories into your uncategorized page. I hope that helps! If it's still confusing, let me know. :) Oh, and AWB is a semi-automated tool that I use to quickly scan thousands of pages, and flag the ones that need categories. It's advanced wiki stuff, no need to worry about it. :) --Elonka 19:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Grazia11

I enjoyed your comments about "pseudoscience" on the AK:talk page.

You might enjoy this: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Fringe_science

... I just finished a major re-write of it. The original was short and quite weak. See what you think. Your contributions or thoughts would be more than welcome.

Drop me a line privately if you wish: aelewis at provide dot net

Cheeers!

Alan -- Alan2012 00:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wellness

I haven't seen you around here recently, and hope you're well. Though there were disagreements over content and style, there's no doubt that your contributions have enriched Wikipedia. Cheers, Will Beback · † · 08:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]