User talk:Graviton4

Unsourced stuff on Transformers: Dark of the Moon

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Transformers: Dark of the Moon. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --uKER (talk) 04:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in List of Hollows in Bleach, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 08:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Notability

Unless an article passes the above guidelines, it shall not have its own guidelines as Wikipedia is not everything. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 18:19, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Colleen O'Shaughnessey.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Colleen O'Shaughnessey.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Vlcsnap-2011-06-16-21h43m40s64.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Vlcsnap-2011-06-16-21h43m40s64.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Vlcsnap-2011-06-17-00h20m59s253.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Vlcsnap-2011-06-17-00h20m59s253.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Sir, i am going to have to ask you to refrain your disruptive editing in Transformers: Dark of the Moon, Steven Blum, Ben 10: Ultimate Alien (Only for confirmed information like how you put up Peter Renaday as Old George which was very nice by the way) and Many More. A couple more like that and you will find out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Fennoy75 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Second Warning

I warned you agian, please do not any false and unsourced credits for James Avery, and Colleen O'Shaughnessey in Transformers Prime They will not appear in the show. And Do not put any false information on List of The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes characters. They will not voice them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Fennoy75 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Graviton4. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ged UK 11:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Untitled Fourth Ben 10 series

The article Untitled Fourth Ben 10 series has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a speculated TV series. The only source is a forum post, so is not reliable. Article is speculation and fundamentally unverifiable. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, wait until there is proper coverage in reliable sources before creating this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 07:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Untitled Fourth Ben 10 series

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Untitled Fourth Ben 10 series, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 07:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assume your talk page is referring to the article above? If so, yes I placed the speedy deletion tag on there, since it was an article that had already been deleted at AfD and did not have reliable sources to show the series is both real and notable. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 15:33, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Transformers 4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Richard Doyle, Override, Ratchet, Richard Green, Onslaught, David Kaufman, Swindle, James Avery, Bombshell, Sideswipe and Leadfoot

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scooby-Doo! The Dread of Chicago

The article Scooby-Doo! The Dread of Chicago has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NFILMS, please wait until principal photography begins before creating this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graviton4. You have new messages at Blanchardb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Template:Scooby-Doo, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -down load ׀ talk 04:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Scooby-Doo! The Dread of Chicago, you may be blocked from editing. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 04:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Scooby-Doo! The Dread of Chicago. -down load ׀ talk 04:08, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

I have blocked your account for persistent removal of AFD template. Any article created in the main space almost immediately becomes visible to the whole world. Create articles in your userspace (like User:Graviton4/Sandbox or User:Graviton4/Stuff or etc.) if you want to have more privacy in developing articles. Materialscientist (talk) 04:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC) Materialscientist (talk) 04:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the proper way to respond to a deletion discussion tag is to make a statement at the appropriate entry in the discussion log, stating how the article meets our current inclusion guidelines. Anything else will not be taken in consideration. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 04:27, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a final note, telling Wikipedia regulars to "mind their own business" is usually counterproductive, especially if you're obviously going against Wikipedia policies and guidelines. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 06:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi There how you doing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SirSoundwave (talk • contribs) 23:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ultimate Spider-Man (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iron Fist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Transformers (film series), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. When are you going to learn? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iron Man 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Sadler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Darkwarriorblake. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Iron Man 3 because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! I know you can read, you clearly just don't give a damn. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 14:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently it's not that you don't give a damn, it's that you're just ignorant. See Iron Man (film) and Iron Man 2 and note that the main villain has never been given second billing, just for being the villain. Hence why your POV OR edits keep getting undone and are now just unconstructive edits. So I suggest that you don't redo it because increasing warnings will be a'comin. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:00, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Your seemingly misogynistic attitude that having a woman second in a list despite the logical argument presented somehow ruins the article, and your threat to come find me, which I confess has me shaking in my shoes, aren't acceptable behaviour. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Iron Man 3 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:44, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is User:Graviton4 reported by User:Sjones23 (Result: ). Thank you. —Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring as well as engaging in threats and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:46, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Man 3

Regarding the recent edit you made to Iron Man 3, you were blocked over this a few days ago. I strongly encourage you to please discuss the casting order on the talk page. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Transformers 4 (2014 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Override, Ratchet, Onslaught, Springer, Swindle, Chris Cox, James Horan, James Avery and Sideswipe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Darkwarriorblake. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Thor: The Dark World because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! You've been told easily a dozen times. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]