User talk:Grant Chuggle
File copyright problem with File:Grant Chuggle's wife.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Grant Chuggle's wife.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Meaghan - Merry Christmas! - 14:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Grant Chuggle. I noticed you, or another editor created a Requests for Adminship page under your name, and I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. Please note that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets an extremely high bar for potential administrator candidates. That being said, I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship, Wikipedia:Adminship is not for new users, and Wikipedia:Not now, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request and are absolutely positive this is what you want, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:01, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Please go ahead and delete it. I was actually just curious as to how people become admins and accidently ending up creating the page. Since I did not know how to delete it I decided to go ahead and fill it out.Grant Chuggle (talk) 15:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
A blast back ...
[edit]Grant,
I saw your post while I was sitting here in an Applebee's checking in on my IPad. Wow! just the right time for it, really.
I don't have any animosity.Don't feel bad. You have hardly been the worst problem editor I've dealt with. I always believed you were trying to do the right thing. Ironically, it turned out that your chief nemeses, CelticLass and IrishGal, were (as their similar names should have told us form the get-go) socks themselves. And they're long gone, while you're still editing sporadically. I appreciate your thanks for what I do, and I encourage you to edit more if you feel like it.
In the long run, growing up feels good, doesn't it? Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)