User talk:GrahamDo

Archives

Hi!

This is my talk page. Please leave messages for me here. I will respond here unless specifically requested otherwise. 'nuff said. :)

Image copyright problem with Image:SAWaste Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SAWaste Logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the infobox with all the fields, as well as explained the use of the logo on the SA Waste Holdings (Pty) Ltd article. I hope this is satisfactory.

References

Hi, you recently added an unreferenced tag to Harry Howard (footballer). Agreed, it doesn't have inline citations, but it does have a References section containing two book sources, each with relevant page number, which I'd have thought was pretty adequate for a four-line stub and infobox. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies :( I see now that there are references. I probably should have used a different template. I'll remove the tag anyway. GrahamDo (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked due to open proxy

I received a notification today (And it's not the first time) that I have been blocked from editing because of the meta:No open proxies rule. The last time this happened, I contacted User:DerHexer about it, and his response to me was that port 80 was open on my IP address. He ignored my attempts to explain why. So I'm explaining why here:

I use an ADSL connection with a dynamic IP address
I have a home network, with two PCs on a LAN connecting through a Windows Server 2003 machine with Internet Connection Sharing enabled
I run a website http://www.communicate.za.net/ from that machine (And use a Dynamic DNS-type service to update my DNS server (http://www.everydns.net/) whenever my IP address changes)
Port 80 is open to allow users to connect to the above website. To the best of my knowledge, the only IP addresses that are allowed outgoing access through that server are in the 192.168.4.* range

If any users online can use that server as a proxy, to connect to the Internet at large through, I'd appreciate it if someone with technical knowledge can help me to disable it. If not, then I ask that the block be lifted, as my server is not an open proxy! GrahamDo (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wary of overturning a block by a steward--but I'm going to talk to DerHexer and see if he can change it to a soft block so you're at least able to edit. Blueboy 96 11:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse Unblock Request This user is clearly a valuable user and this type of block, unless the user really is editing under an open proxy, is not in compliance with the blocking policy Mww113 (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~I'm looking into requesting IP block exemption for your account. Please stand by. Anthøny (talk) 14:39, 19 October 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]
Unblocked - see below. – Anthøny (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I have lifted the block on 198.54.202.30; you should now be able to edit.

Request handled by: Anthøny (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but what if my IP address changes again? Does it run the risk of being blocked after a few days? May I make a suggestion that authenticated and logged in users be exempt from the open proxy rule? GrahamDo (talk) 19:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the Non-free use rationale template to all of the above images. GrahamDo (talk) 06:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CallieMemorialPhoto.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CallieMemorialPhoto.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've put this photo back on the Ashley Callie article. I feel it's perfectly relevant there.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nico Pretorius Callie Accident Accused.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nico Pretorius Callie Accident Accused.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've put this picture back on the Ashley Callie article. I don't think it's a WP:BLP issue at all, and I think it's perfectly relevant for the article. GrahamDo (talk) 05:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode font.

Re [1]: the Japanese interlang link was broken - have a look at the Firefox browser for Unicode support. -- Jeandré, 2008-11-22t20:17z

Unsigned comment

You may want to sign this comment. JoshuaZ (talk) 16:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the heads-up!! :) GrahamDo (talk) 06:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Renderotica

A tag has been placed on Renderotica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Miami33139 (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on your talk page. I think you have the wrong person. :) --GrahamDo (talk) 09:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for advice

Merry Christmas.

I have been contributing to wikipedia for some years. I have never sought to be an administrator as I would not place myself before the adolescent thugs who think they own the project. (They know who they are.)

I have been trying to work out the current situation regarding auto-formattig of dates. I read you comment made at 6:19 on 27 Oct 08 on the Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Date autoformatting page. I agree with them. I can't really see any point in the general use of date linking. However I am very attached to auto-formatting of dates.

I find "February 18, 2004" very off-putting. It detracts from my reading of the encyclopedia. I prefer "18 February 2004". In the past I [[ ]] linked dates so that all who had set preferences (presumably the only people who care) could view the dates in their preferred mode. I was told this was "deprecated". Okay, I thought, I won't link dates whichh are already in my preferred style but I will link those in any other style. I'll cut down my linking by being less considerate to those who use other than the British style.

I now find a bloody bot rampaging around wrecking the date linking I put in. As I said I'm not wedded to linking but the dates should be formatted or we'll all become Americans at an accelerated pace. What can now be done? Avalon (talk) 19:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. --GrahamDo (talk) 10:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. No, I know of no such person. If I discover someone who has done this, I'll let you know. Hope you let me know if you come across a solution. Avalon (talk) 10:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding more information on Alexandra_Powers article

Hi! I would like to add to the Alexandra_Powers atricle because I think she grew up in manhanttan because I read on on a website about 5 years ago. Should I add that? Thank you! Neptunekh2 (talk) 03:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry only got your message now. I see you've already been helped. :) --GrahamDo (talk) 10:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SA Waste Holdings

Hi. I moved the article per your request.

By the way, I moved the article in the first place based on a request from User:UnitedStatesian. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Emmarentia Tunnel Where Callie Accident Happened.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Emmarentia Tunnel Where Callie Accident Happened.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WhackheadSimpson-OhMyGreatnessHits.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:WhackheadSimpson-OhMyGreatnessHits.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WhackheadSimpson-Whackhead'sWindowOnTheWorld.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:WhackheadSimpson-Whackhead'sWindowOnTheWorld.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WhackheadSimpson-BestOfWHACKHEADPhonePranks.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:WhackheadSimpson-BestOfWHACKHEADPhonePranks.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WhackheadSimpson-SerialPrankster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:WhackheadSimpson-SerialPrankster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:MN laugh episod24 2 2 700k.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:MN laugh episod24 2 2 700k.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Downs article

Hello GrahamDo. I see that you have been a contributor on Wikipedia for some time, which is why I am surprised that you apparently wrote an article about yourself. As per Wikipedia's policy on autobiographies, this is a strongly discouraged practice. It is difficulty to write a neutral, factual and verifiable article about oneself.

Many of your references are to blogs, which by definition are self-published sources and therefore unreliable. Please supply some secondary sources that have an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight - otherwise the material will likely be challenged and/or removed. --Drm310 (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:Drm310

Thank you for the concern!

I felt that, as a published author now, my works and I were encyclopedic enough to warrant a Wikipedia article, but I couldn't count on any of my readers to write one.

I was very careful to not reference any sites that I have control over (such as my website), because I wanted to AVOID the potential COI, and it was never my intention to continue to make heavy edits to the article. I was hoping at least one person from the community would pick it up and run with it.

I honestly never knew about the problem with the self-published sources, but I've cited ISBNs for all my books now, which hopefully helps to mitigate that somewhat.

If you wish, please remove all text that you can't find substantiation for in a source that isn't self-published, and I will continue to look for other sources.

--GrahamDo (talk) 12:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GrahamDo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JeremyMansfield AWordOr2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JeremyMansfield AWordOr2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GrahamDo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GrahamDo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]