This is an archive of past discussions with User:Graham87. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I was looking at your edits and I thought I'd point out that while most URLs begin with www, not all of them do. Going through and putting "www" in front of every URL in wikipedia will certainly break a lot of links. --Kainaw(talk)14:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Tristan and Isolde opening
Hi Graham87,
Thanks for the note about the music file I uploaded. Since you have uploaded a free alternative, I see no reason for my file to be kept around. Cheers, bdesham★01:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit on the Richard Clayderman talk page as per WP:BIOG. This states that: Editors should remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced, relies upon sources that do not meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Verifiability, or is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see Wikipedia:No original research)... These principles apply to biographical material about living persons found anywhere in Wikipedia, including user and talk pages. (My emphasis). I consider phrases like "...a banalization faggot...", "his musical reductions of classics suck real bad" and "his whole carreer is based on misleading ignorant people" to be defamatory.
Thanks for your response. I take your points but I would say two things. First, it is very difficult to "refactor" a talk page. These are signed (usually) personal statements, and rewriting them is not appropriate. Deletion is the only option if they contain defamatory material. The problem is that the comments I have higlighted (along with a few others) are more than just forcefully expressed opinions about the content or the structure of the page. They are forcefully expressed opinions about the subject, which certainly under British law could be considered libel. For example, is it true that Clayderman is a "faggot", banalising or otherwise? Harry was a white dog with black spots16:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia. Could you also please consider using our vandal warning system [1]? First offenses get a "test1," then a "test2," followed by a "test3" and "test4." At the end of this, if the vandal persists, he or she merits blocking for a period of time. If you do this, it will greatly help us in decreasing vandalism on Wikipedia. Much thanks, -- Kukinihablame aqui15:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
No need to warn vandals. Just didn't know if you knew about the process. As an administrator, it is a lot easier to shut down vandalism once editors have been properly warned, thus the request. No offense intended, of course. On the second question you asked, honestly, I am not sure why I made that specific edit. I sometimes go back a few to make sure that all vandalism was reverted if I cannot tell that one a few back was done. That is likely the case. --Kukinihablame aqui16:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Graham, and thanks for correcting the file names on the.ogg file at the Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 page. (I don't even remember placing it there!) I do recall doing a major re-write, but allowing the "cartoon" material to remain.) If time permits, I would enjoy doing more work on the page, particularly relating the composition to events in the composer's life.
Sorry for the delayed response...I've had a busy season of performing (and, of course, Liszt's Second Hungarian Rhapsody is ALWAYS an audience favourite!!!). Keep up the great work! Prof.rick23:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Asperger_syndrome, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lucky number 4902:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm aware that the comments in question were considered offensive. It is generally considered best to ignore vandals and trolls on talk pages. Lucky number 4902:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the advice; I am a new-ish vandal fighter and appreciate all the help! Thank you very much. I will now revert, rather than remove. Thanks again! Sincerely, Neranei12:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
template problem ro.wiki
Thanks for the answer regarding the templates. I will talk to one of the admins on ro.wiki to see how can the problem be solved. Cheers. ro:Utilizator:Bekuletz 16:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
TDK Australian Audio Book Awards
Thankyou for fixing the John Marsden link on these awards. I am a pretty new Wikipedian and am trying to get into good routines re checking links but clearly I sometimes forget! Glad you noticed. Sterry260712:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately these awards only went for about 10 years. I came across them when I was researching Patsy Adam-Smith. I am becoming a bit familiar with the audiobook world as my mother-in-law is legally blind now and I order her audiobooks from the library. It's a cahllenge finding good ones for an old lady who can't manage all technologies. I guess you are into e-books and a whole range of ways of communicating. Do you like John Marsden? Anyhow, thanks again. Regards Sterry260712:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
That's very kind of you. Yes, she is. And they've given/lent her a Daisy machine which she likes. I don't choose from there - they just send. Great service. I do selections for her from our local public library home service (Canberra). I read some Marsden when my kids were a bit younger. I liked 'So much to tell you'. I found 'Letters from the inside' gut wrenching. I got tired of 'Tomorrow when the war began' though. Stopped at number 3 or 4. Well, it's late and I'm tired so it's off to bed. Nice talking to you. Sterry260713:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi graham - seems like a while since I last wrote to you/spoke with you - satu suro here - I suspect you are a windows user - as I am on a pair of intel imacs (ok greedy) - one of my widgets says it is at - http://book-bot.com/bookbot/public/ - might be worth knowing about if you didnt know about it - widgets for the imac grow like mushrooms - in every sense - and it is a fairly good range - some duplication - but more than any one person could want or need - thats for sure. My father was going blind a year or two before he died - but had little patience or interest in listening to anything at that stage. Do you have itunes or get any podcasts at all? I would recommend some if you were interested - its a nightmare of a place (itunes pod area) to navigate - if you were interested I could point you if you were into any abc stuff at all. Hope I am not being a busy body here- cheers SatuSuro12:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
speedy delete
I have to deal with a short term issue - will try to get back a bit later - will explain cheers sats SatuSuro 13:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Actually I hope to go to the meetup - and there are some issues i need with this evaded speedy delete near disaster - will get back to you soon over the weekend. SatuSuro13:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi & thanks
Hi Graham,
Thanks for editing my toe walking page. This is the first wikipedia page I've created. I've added in several references but my page is still tagged as needing additional references or sources for verification. What do I need to do to fix this?
Goa has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Wellington and Wellington Region merger
if you're reading this message, it's because you're a person who has edited either of the Wellington articles. This is a courtesy note to let you know that I proposed a merger between the two pages, and we need to know your opinion. Kripto22:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Midland and Bellevue
The midland article reads badly - there is a lot of pov in there with no cites - and the bellevue one is so so - so my apologies - i didnt meant to step on your toes in my changing things. Interesting south spur railway appears to have its depot on the land that lies just south of the very large grain silo that sits parallel to the eastern railway between the roe highway bridge and Lloyd street crossing - where the new harvey norman and midland central shops that have been built on the midland workshops area that got flattened by so called redevelopment of the site. Bellevue used to have a primary school but it got closed and they have to go to koongamias renamed school up the hill towards greenmount. There was an interesting thing on life matters on radio national this am about the reducing investment government school system in australia- and also yesterday driving along guildford road in maylands and the large building that i think used to be part of the blind institute has been knocked down - so I think - with typos - this morning the issue is change. cheers SatuSuro 03:31, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
It still does- the smell that is - when I used to live in Bassendean - on a night with a strong easterly the smell would drift our way. The bad smell seems to be confined to when you pass through by car on the great eastern highway by pass that goes from south guildford through hazelmere and joins up with the roe highway south of bellevue. I am unlikely to do any battye library or state records work for about another two or three months - I am sure there must be heaps of refs. It used to be a quiet area - but now with the abernethy road extension and the massive industrial sites stretching around the north east boundary of the perth airport property - it is changed forever. bushmead is what i was thinking - used to be a stopping place on the kalamunda railway line - and also a rifle range and i think during the second world war an army location - and is now one of the few locations with unspoilt vegetation due to the massive residential things in helena valley and high wycombe. Its hard to do a suburb specific thing on all these bits and pieces as it lies literally at the junction of up to 4 localities more less. will try to get back to you on this - have to do things with my kids - last day of school hols. and as a last teaser - my father was one of the group of people who helped the founders of the guide dogs for the blind here in perth - maybe i have already told you i dont know - got to go - cheers SatuSuro03:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey Graham!
According to the WP:NA page, you have shown interest in being nominated as an admin. I did a quick edit count and it shows that you have made over 19,000 edits since Feb. 2005. I clicked on some random edits you've made in the past and they all seem to be very good edits. If you still want to be an admin, please tell me and I'll be sure to nominate you! Have fun editing and I'll see you around. Oh...and that's a whole lot of edits, especially since you're bogged down by a screen reader! =) Jumpingcheese06:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I checked back into the achieves and found that User:Durin asked you about adminship back in Jan. 2006. You had 7,000 edits back then and I'm sure you are more than ready to become an admin after almost two more years of experience. Jumpingcheese06:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I'll be my pleasure to nominate you. I'll create the nomination on Saturday, so you can participate in it! Until then, farewell. =) Jumpingcheese04:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about disappearing for two days...I got really busy and did not get the chance to even log on. I'm ready to create a nomination page and here is the description I have in mind:
"Graham87, previously known as Pianoman87 until March 2006, has been an active and prolific member of Wikipedia since February 2005: amassing over 19,000 edits in that time. Most of his edits are in cleaning up pages by removing dead links, removing link spam, and correcting the general flow of the page. Graham has made extensive edits to various pages, from Asperger syndrome to Piano to Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). Graham has a knack of finding mistakes and correcting them or reporting them to Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors. He's also active in the talk pages, keeping a level head and coming to consensus favorable to all parties involved.
I came across many of Graham's edits during my comparatively brief career on Wikipedia and always assumed that he was an admin. He seems to have slipped through the cracks by blending in and working well with others. That does not mean that his edits go unnoticed; Graham has already been offered to be nominated twice, but he turned the offers down due to obligations at those times."
How does that sound? Make any edits (add examples, expand, and what not) so the description sounds perfect. Hopefully you will be unanimously promoted to adminship! =) Jumpingcheese18:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about missing talk page for the fathers/mothers list, and for inciting you to undo so many edits. I probabably should not have unilaterally undeleted that page, but I was a bit outraged that it had gotten to that point where things like that get deleted, despite a discussion that I thought could not be legitimately closed any way but "no consensus". I so rarely deal with pages that are likely to be deleted (except taking care of PRODs I don't care about) that I forgot the dangers of editing while angry. Cheers.--ragesoss12:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Admin nom
Jumping cheese would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Jumping cheese to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Graham87. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
I am the person who added the 'sources' links to the clarinet, piano and ABRSM pages recently. The links that was deleted.
Please tell me why these links were deleted, or more specifically, why these pages were not 'deemed' relevant to the articles. One of the links on the clarinet page is broken, but still it remains. Still others also link to commercial sites whithin themselves. I do not think wikipedia is a depository of links, but do you not think that a site that sources all the sheet music for students of the Royal Schools of Music is more relevant to the instrument page than a site that shows what buttons to cover on the clarinet to produce certain notes? Sure, the links I added were to blogs, but what difference does this make, since it is obviously not to a personal blog? And yes, I am aware of the nofollow tags as well.
That actually makes sense. I understand what you are saying. Let me know what you think about adding it to the ABRSM website.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aubrey de Wet (talk • contribs) 8:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC).
Autism
Why did you remove see also section? Asperger syndrome is an autistic disorder. There should be a see also section. Thank you. RS200702:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Editlinks for sections and the headings
Hello Graham. A german user creates a JavaScript-Hack for my Monobook-JS, which put the Editlink behind the heading, so that Jaws-users (and other SR) now simply can navigate with "h" or "Shift+h" from heading to heading and always hear the section-title first. This gives me a very fast navigation and I don't need the content-menue no more. surueña
described this problem with section-editlinks and headings here. You can also use this JS, wehen you go here, type in Graham87 instead of "your username" and push the "implement-button". Here you will find the code for that very nice function. Some german admins want to implement this functionality into the MediaWiki-software, so that after this all SR-users simply can jump from heading to heading and hear the section-title first before the editlink, without needing this special JavaScript-hack. What do you think about this? Congratulations for your admin nomination and good luck! regards from Kassel in Germany. -- Lalue08:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Reminder
Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/3 is next sunday 19th August, if you haven't already please sign on the meetup page if your coming, if your still unsure indicate anyway so I can confirm numbers with the venue thankyou Gnangarra00:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Adminship
Hello Graham87,
I saw your RFA nomination and have been following it closely. I voted in favour of you (I must have, seeing as everyone did). Anyway, I'm writing to draw your attention to this as it may help you get adminship early - Pheonix17:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
I can only say that I can think of no one better to deal with the dark side, well done and looking forward to catching up other than this weekend. Best wishes SatuSuro01:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the congrats everyone, and thanks to everyone who supported me in my RFA. I'll have to wait until I get home from uni before I can use my tools though ... Wikipedia is addictive. Graham8702:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete valid links to Youtube, as you did with several Gwen Stefani articles. Videos posted by universalmusicgroup (Universal Music Group) are not copyright violations. 17Drew08:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Somebody Told Me, you will be blocked from editing. 17Drew08:09, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I looked through a bunch, and it looks like they were all valid videos uploaded by Universal (except for one by Fueled by Ramen). I'll go through all the videos and make sure they're legal before rolling back. My apologies for templating you, but I wasn't sure what other option there was when I wasn't getting any sort of response and you were still reverting one or two articles a minute. 17Drew08:25, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
-Dear Graham 87,
My name is Charles Mark,.my e-mail is Larimar@bellsouth.net
I have attempted to insert an incident that occurred with my father,John Mark,and his good friend Arthur Godfrey in 1954.I personally know of his because my father told me about it before he passed away in 1983.I learned the specifics about the ufo just recently by seeing it on the web on 3 different websites-including the actual unclassified documents that were made available to the public and can be found(actual interview 11 pages)on the Blue Book Archives of 1954.
As I am new to Wikipedia,I am trying to be a good journalist and report clear,concise,objective info..
My Father John S.Mark wmt-amwas an owner of American Broadcasting Stationsthat bought wmt-am radio in 1944.Previously,his mother,my Grandmother,Helen S.Mark,was the founder of the Blue Network that became the ABC network in 1944.
Godfrey had his first job in talk radio on my Grandfather's,LeRoy Mark,radio station in Washington D.C..This is where Godfrey and my Father met.They were fellow pilots and were good friends until Godfrey passed away in '83,the same year my father died.My grandfather,Leroy Mark,died on June 1,1938,and my Grandmother,Helen S.Mark, took over as Chairman of American Broadcasting Stations and held that position until 1968 when the company and wmt-am/fm/tv was sold.
Her manager of wmt-amandwmt-tvwas a man called Bill Quarton,who died last week at the age of 104 years old.He wrote a book titledLucky Manthat was published in the'90's.This is a biography of his life.
Walter Cronkite worked as a news reader for my Father on wmt-amin the late '40's.Walter and my Father were fellow owners of a radio station in Daytona Beach,Fl.[wdat]]in the late '50's.Walter is still alive.He has been recognized as one of the leading broadcasters in U.S. history because of his honesty and integrity.
This is only a partial summary of the history of my family's background in the broadcasting business.I have told you this for only the reason to let you know I am serious in my statements to you and to Wikipedia.
The main question I have for you is this.>How do I qualify the ufo story about Arthur Godfrey and my Father"s encounter on June25,1954,for insertion into Godfrey's Bio.??>> I know that this occurred. I am a witness to my Father's story about that day in '54 .The reason Godfrey's name was not on the report was the fact that John Mark was the Pilot in Command of the aircraft that day.As I said earlier,my Dad told me about the incident and the fact that they both had to sign documents and swear that they would not repeat the story to anyone,otherwise be imprisoned under the U.S. espionage act.This is why Godfrey did not talk about it before he died,nor did my Dad give me any great detail of the description and details of the object that they witnessed together.
On the actual unclassified report by the government it is noted that my Dad had 5000-6000 hrs.flight time ,- also,single,multi,commercial engine ratings.It also states that he was a veteran U.S.Marine-(he was wounded in action on Iwo Jima on Feb19,1944.)He was a serious aviator and broadcaster who was known for his honesty and integrity.
Please let me know your idea or suggestions about this.I read your info sheet and am very impressed with your knowledge and skills .I would like to be involved with wikipedia and hope that we can keep in contact.I also would appreciate your advise and council.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Charles Mark
www.larimarsource.com
www.blackcalcite.com
www.shamanite.com
I am too worn down to try dispute resolution. Listening to one of your volunteers make those kind of comments reflects a lot of things. The wikipedia speaks of vandalism, that sort of behavior and judgement to keep topics out, could also be labelled as vandalism.
Vandalism does not have to be willful or on purpose, it also includes ignorance (looked up the word), ignorance means:
'lacking in knowledge or training; unlearned'
That is exactly the issue here, people who have no knowledge of a subject making a judgement to keep topics or articles out of wikipedia for the reason, 'the subject is insignificant'. When 'called to the carpet' on such a judgement, the response is, 'troll', 'go away', 'I am only following orders'.
I read the section on dispute resolution and mediation, etc. Most suggestions can not be followed since the article is removed almost right away by one of your volunteers. This in reference to your comment at Wikipedia Articles. The article in question was called 'soldiers of the cross - colorado' which has nothing to do with the 'soldiers of the cross' article, they are two different organizations. The Colorado organization is referenced in articles on wikipedia and in external sources.65.87.185.7316:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Tasmania page edit
While I recognise your point on conflict of interest and you have removed the information on the Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race, I have contributed this specfic SYHR and title of my book as sources of information about these points because the article itself is lacking in imoprtant details or information about these.
The Sydney-Hobart information is not good enough, I have written an entire book about this event (anf the Cruising Yacht Club of australia actually check their facts/stats with me) and can therefore add better quality information than is present on this site.
My book listed in the references details some of the most important and fundamental events in Tasmania's history including settlement, federation, the development of some of Tasmania's biggest industries, the 1967 bushfires, the Tasman Bridge collpase and the POrt Arthur massacre. My "conflict of interest" in this instance actually allows me to be knowledgable enough to understand where the deficiencies are in this page and provide further information for users. As a 19 year old Perth man, I am wndering how much of this you could understand?? It si best to let the experts in differing fields add the information they know best about —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludekepublishing (talk • contribs) 06:57, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
. . . but you are trying to convince people, most of them college kids, to show some kind of appreciation for something of which they have no knowledge. The only thing to do is to chill and let them play their games. It is a useless battle.65.87.185.7316:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
. . . when I was layed up in the hospital, the only thing to do was watch TV and in the morning, Hi-5 was on, a kid's show. The show is ok, nothing fantastic, not the most popular, but each cast member has a biography on wikipedia, such as Karla Cheatham Mosley. Why would reviewers allow that but delete articles of much more importance? Because it is on TV and has a nice external website to link to? I do not know the answer but it shows the level that some of the reviewers operate at.65.87.185.7318:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
No Problem
However, if wikipedia wants donations from people then it might be prudent to take comments seriously rather than worry about where they were positoned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.87.185.73 (talk) 06:11, August 29, 2007 (UTC)
florence crime
Thank you. I'm new to this and so was afraid to remove the section, and trying to fix it seemed too daunting. Hopefully the voice of reason will prevail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.176.167.38 (talk) 00:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Debussy copyright
I'm not gonna restore the Youtube link (I haven't looked to see if you're right that it's not that good), but for reference, being that he died before 1923, all of his music is in the public domain, unless not published until later. Just to let you know :) ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫11:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Autism edits
Hey, Graham. I'm at a loss for what to do next with AnnieTigerChucky (talk·contribs). Considering this user's edit history, I suspect s/he might be very young. S/he has given no indication of having read his/her talk page or received the messages several editors have left about the problematic edits. I don't know what to do next if we can't reach this person and get him/her to discuss edits, and I've not yet encountered an edit by him/her that didn't need to be reverted. What do we do with possibly good faith children making a lot of bad edits and not knowing how to discuss them on talk pages? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for those samples, Graham. The difference in those cases is that there actually was some communication with those editors. In the case of AnnieTigerChucky, we have no indication if the editor is even reading edit summaries or knows how to use talk pages. If not very young, there could be some kind of communication impairment, so I really don't know what we can do next. Perhaps watch, wait and see is best for a bit? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Graham, I put up the topic change on Deconstructionism. Yes, it is a different topic to deconstruction and does not deserve a redirect excluding it from a reference source. I went looking for any topics on Deconstructionism in wikipedia and did not find any.
So, I ended up writing my own.
Having written the topic, I will be expanding on it to provide a thorough coverage.
I am disappointed that Wik references deconstructionist as a referential point but does not even attempt to explain it.
Thank you for your input. I do apologise if at the moment I come across as either a vandal or just making up a category for the purpose of having one. I am a 'newbie' to Wik and therefore, be gentle. However, my reason for writing about deconstructionism is the fact that NO ARTICLE was supplied on the topic. I was cross, so i'm trying to write my own. BTW social collapse is not explicitly or exclusively deemed to be the end result of deconstructionism. Sometimes the society picks up on deconstructionism as being a false exit and mends itself.
The topic currently reads like a dictionary article because at this stage i'm just sticking in a filler, a stub to build on. Like most good stubs that actually expand into a proper encyclopedic topic .. it starts small and grows. I would expect that by the end of it, I end up with more than just my contribution to the article.
Just bear with me on two parts. First, google the topic and realise it has a lot of information that can be used and associated with it. HOWEVER, it remains a seperate topic from both any reference to social collapse, socialism, deconstruction or postmodernism. Now, some people associate it with religion, which is a poor ending for what is a wider than a single area phenomenon. It is a mistake to associate it with one specific social construct (religion or political).
And .. THATS why its an important topic to write about.
Now .. an aside .. can i plz register myself? I dont know how to !
it would make topical conversation about 3x easier !
Hope everything is fine with you. I just had a quick look at your user page. I was very impressed and moved when I read that even with your vision problem, you are helping wikipedia do a great job and being recognized and awarded for your efforts. Congratulations.
Incidentally, I visited only Perth many years ago while I was in Australia for less than a week. It's a nice, pleasant and peaceful place.
Being new to trying to contribute information to wikipedia, there are obviously many things to learn. I can only try to help put in information in the topics that I'm a little familiar with. If I'm not doing it correctly, your guidance is appreciated.
Greetings to you again. We are actually only about five hours apart, a pretty small world. Five hours meaning, if I flew from where I am to Perth, the flight would take about 5 hours.
I just read your latest message twice: It's a lot to digest; so much to learn before I can get better at this. I'm very much a computer illiterate but I'm trying to learn. There are some technical advice you gave that I don't completely understand yet.
Thanks for making spelling corrections in Wikipedia. However, there are several problems with the approach that you are taking. One is that you should not correct spelling in signed comments on talk pages - it is a user's comment and it is considered rude to make spelling corrections to it. The second is that your edits sometimes make it difficult to revert vandalism. For example your edit to [[Emperor Penguin] masked some vandalism that had occurred before (see the previous diffs) so it was much harder to remove the vandalism. Frankly, if you were reading the text, the vandalism at the end of the paragraph you were editing - "sean is cool" - should have been obvious. Automated spell-checking is a very bad idea if you don't check the results before you hit save; not just for that reason but because you might have changed the spelling of a quote or some foreign name. For example, "Moreso" is a legitimate name used in the article Pompeu Fabra University. Graham8711:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Asperger_syndrome, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lucky number 49 02:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dirty Little Secret. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. 17Drew 08:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Somebody Told Me, you will be blocked from editing. 17Drew 08:09, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
