User talk:Gr1st/Archive 18

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

→

Archive 25

Jaguar Land Rover info box

Hi, as a very experienced editor on UK company articles, I would be grateful for your input on a seemingly minor point regarding the infobox of the above article but which does in my view have wider relevance. The issue concerns the presentation of the 'public limited company' suffix to the company name. Thanks in advance.Rangoon11 (talk) 19:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Replied on the article talk page. Gr1st (talk) 20:00, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to post your thoughts, much appreciated.Rangoon11 (talk) 23:22, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Atos Wikipedia page - neutrality is disputed

Hello Gr1st,

Just a brief introduction. I'm working at Atos as a social media manager. Yesterday I've met the founder of Wikipedia Jimmy Walsh. It was really an honor to meet him at the iStrategy Digital Comms Event. After his presentation we spoke briefly about the best way of working approaching the Wikipedia editors about the presentation of facts at Wikipedia. He has advised me to approach the editors who have been editing the page the most. So I like to ask you to collaborate in keeping the Atos page factually correct. The way it is presented right now compromises the neutrality of Atos page seriously.

Would you consider removing or repositioning the recent added fact:

There has been such anger about Atos's Assessment of disabled people, for the UK Government, that a campaign to object to their involvement with the 2012 Paralympics has been called for by 'Black Triangle' the Scottish Disability Defence organisation.

The additional copy is factually true, but should it be on the top of the page? It is better to publish at the paragraph " Controversy over benefit assessments".

And don't you agree that the comment should be sourced? With actually statements?

If you think the neutralize it, would you add the following sentence? " Paul Deighton, CEO of London 2012 in a recent TV interview described the idea of a boycott of the Paralympic Games as perverse. The Paralympics is an elite and unique sporting event for athletes with a disability. "

It would be very helpful if you can edit the page as soon as you have the opportunity. Thank you in advance.

Muriel

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.240.17 (talk) 13:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC) 

You are correct that such a comment shouldn't be at the top of the page. I have reworded it to use neutral language and moved it down the article, adding a reliable source as reference. Gr1st (talk) 19:42, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Gr1st. Thanks for editing.

Looking at the page now, do you think you can help me restructuring it? I like to bring more balance in it. If I check and compare with other IT Companies, I see chances for improvement. I can send you more information about the actual contributions of Atos in the general and in the IT Business.

For example:

. Names + bios of General Management ·         IT Partners ·         Short factual description of the services ·         Short factual description of each industry market ·         Short factual description on which countries Atos operates in ·         Achievements in collaboration with the IOC e.g. the Olympic Games and Paralypics ·         Achievements in Innovation including: Zero Email; Scientific Community; IT Challenge ·         Awards - http://atos.net/en-us/Newsroom/en-us/awards/default.htm

Would you like to help with re-indexing the page? Thank you for considering it. Wkr,

Muriel — Preceding unsigned comment added by A144808 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New York Stock Exchange.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New York Stock Exchange.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scottish and Southern Energy.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scottish and Southern Energy.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

PwC

Hi, I would be most grateful if you could add your thoughts at a discussion on the Talk page of the above article regarding a proposed move of the article back to the PricewaterhouseCoopers name.Rangoon11 (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I've decided not to vote as I have no particular opinion one way or the other. WP:COMMONNAME should be the applicable guideline but having reviewed a range of sources it is not clear to me that either term is sufficiently dominant. Best, Gr1st (talk) 12:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

No worries, I respect that.Rangoon11 (talk) 16:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For all of the invaluable work which you do on company articles. Rangoon11 (talk) 16:50, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Appreciate it, thanks very much! Gr1st (talk) 19:09, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Accor logo

Hi Gr1st, I see that you've been active recently in updating the Accor page. I noticed on the French side they have the new logo updated but I haven't been successful in updating the logo on the English side. Do you know how to do this? You can see the logo here: http://www.accor.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Contenus_Accor/Finance/Pressreleases/2011/EN/110913_pr_nouvelle_strategie_marketing_accor.pdf

Thanks a lot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shipseybrian (talk • contribs) 17:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ebro Puleva.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ebro Puleva.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

On Atos page a demystifiing publication in relation to DWP contract

On the Atos pages an article has been published that demystifies some of the stats around the DWP contract. Can you include a link and amend the text?

Here is the link: http://fullfact.org/factchecks/ATOS_ESA_assessments_overturned-3135

Can you replace the text below: Tribunal appeals against Employment Support Allowance eligibility are documented by the Department of Work and Pensions own statistics to be running at 36% of those refused benefit, with a greater than 70% success rate when taken forward with the support of advocacy groups and around 40% without support

With this one: Tribunal appeals against Employment Support Allowance eligibility are documented by the Department for Work and Pensions own statistics. They show that around 9% of all decisions made are successfully appealed. Of all decisions taken to appeal around 38% are successful and around 70% of appeals made are successful when an advocacy group is involved.

Many thanks A144808 — Preceding unsigned comment added by A144808 (talk • contribs) 09:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Atos number of employees not correct

Hello Gr1st,

I've seen that you changed the number of employees back from 74,000 to 78,500. Since Oct 25th we communicate about the complete number of employees. Please read the Third quarter 2011 revenue press release as for the official communication moment. http://atos.net/en-us/Newsroom/en-us/Press_Releases/2011/2011_10_25_01.htm Or would you like to wait for the next Annual Report 2011 to change the numbers?

Please let me know. A144808 — Preceding unsigned comment added by A144808 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Capital & Counties Properties.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Capital & Counties Properties.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Capital Shopping Centres Group.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Capital Shopping Centres Group.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 03:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In CAC 40, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Legrand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Saab Automobile and Swedish Automobile

Hello! I may have been confused. According to Metro.se, chairman Victor Muller said (in Swedish): "Swedish Automobiles won't be involved in Saab in the future" (source text: "Hur som helst kommer inte Swedish Automobiles att vara inblandat i Saab i framtiden"). Does it mean that Swedish Automobile is defunct? Also, is Swedish Automobile the same as Spyker's partner company, and are they technically related to Saab Automobile? Thanks in advance, HeyMid (contribs) 19:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for taking so long to respond, I haven't been around for a couple of weeks. My removal of anything referring to it being defunct was merely down to the fact that Swedish Automobile N.V. was (and still is) in existence as a legal entity (its shares are still being traded on the stock exchange even up to today, for example). It may well be liquidated in the weeks to come, but it hasn't happened yet. Regards, Gr1st (talk) 20:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Neopost page

Hello,

The previous page has been edited by one of our competitor. Many informations were wrong. We just gave informations that people use to ask us. We edited our page because we are in position to give the right information, it is not conflict of interest.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neopost (talk • contribs) 10:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Banco Sabadell.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Banco Sabadell.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)