User talk:Gpic

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Corchorus, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 21:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Hat, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest policy and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Articles

OhNoitsJamie

Dear Sir, In relation to the chorcorus aritcle, I was intending to put the references for the page after I was done with the assignment I have for editing 10 articles in order to put pictures on the article that my company wants to put on wikipedia. Thus, it is my intention to do so if I am unblocked.

As for the Hat article, I truly apologize, I don't have previous experience editing wikipedia and did not realize that I was violating advertising rules for editing articles.

Therefore, please give me a chance to fix the above and abide by the rules to complete this crucial assignment.

Thanking You in Advance!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gpic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Sir,In relation to the chorcorus aritcle, I was intending to put the references for the page after I was done with the assignment I have for editing 10 articles in order to put pictures on the article that my company wants to put on wikipedia. Thus, it is my intention to do so if I am unblocked.

As for the Hat article, I truly apologize, I don't have previous experience editing wikipedia and did not realize that I was violating advertising rules for editing articles.

Therefore, please give me a chance to fix the above and abide by the rules to complete this crucial assignment.

Thanking You in Advance!

Decline reason:

I don't think that unblocking someone with such severe conflict of interest will benefit the encyclopedia. Max Semenik (talk) 05:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.