User talk:Gothmogxx

April 2011

Your recent edit to the page Predators (film) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 18:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Friday the 13th

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Friday the 13th (1980 film), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 18:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First, there was no source for the Siskel and Ebert info, and second there was no source that it "gained a cult following" and "received more positive reaction from critics". You cannot go by RT's percentage, because they don't collect historical figures. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 04:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to film articles

Please stop changing the critical reception of Predator 2 from "negative" to "mixed to negative". This is whitewashing of the film's reception. Overall critical reaction to the film was negative, not mixed. The film has only a 23% approval rating from critics at Rotten Tomatoes, which is clearly negative (fewer than ¼ of critics listed gave it a positive review, while more than ¾ gave it a negative review). Continually changing the language to "mixed to negative" without citing a source is an example of POV. This also goes for all of the other film articles in which you have repeatedly changed the language relating to the films' reception. If you make an edit and it is reverted, please discuss it on the article's talk page instead of making the same edit again. This is called the bold-revert-discuss cycle and allows us to establish consensus for certain changes and avoid edit wars. --IllaZilla (talk) 20:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page Fright Night (2011 film) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HumancentiPad

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to HumancentiPad. The film The Human Centipede was released in 2010, not 2009. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Recent Edit

Hello, I'm LordHarris. I noticed that you made an edit to Knightsridge which did not appear to conform with our policies and guidelines; I've removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! LordHarris (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]