User talk:Gordonfreemanfan

July 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at German American. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. freshacconci talk to me 10:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of SolarKnightHere (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian, I'm going to call the FBI about this. You banned me permanently over making edits and expalin why and since I explained it you perma ban me? YZou gotta be kidding. I thought I gave legimate reasons. Either way, I'm going to take this to the FBI. I'm not going to get hammered perma bans for just this. What's your email or phone number? Gordonfreemanfan (talk) 10:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gordonfreemanfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is there any other admin that can give me emails or phone numbers of contact? I feel as if I was unjustly ruled. I even sent and e-mail to user SFK2 even before Favorian banned me. I would really like to get phone numbers to resolve this. thank you. Gordonfreemanfan (talk) 10:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked and not banned ... and you're blocked because you used multiple accounts improperly. Posting the % of a specific background in a community is not personal, nor inappropriate - demographics is a major part of our country and community articles. You were repeatedly removing it, contrary to the rules you agreed to when you signed up to this private website. You have no right nor authority, nor even any good reason to remove it - most certainly not one related to privacy (unless we said "The town of Middle-of-Nowhere, Idaho has a population of 7. One of them (Larry) is German). We now have a more important issue: you violated our no legal threats policy related to "going to the FBI". Again, this is a PRIVATE website - you AGREED to the rules, and legal threats are an indefinite block (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gordonfreemanfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You're not above the United States constitution. The first amendment gives me the right to free speech and to protest if I want to. By blocking me for allowing me to give my view point is against the first amendment of the united states constitution which is against the law. The US constitution is the supreme law of the land. I wasn't giving and violent threats or anything but my rights to freedom of speech and to protest. You can't just make your own rule set that makes yuou say what is and what isn't free speech. If you disagree with my editing then that's fine. But you are against the law if your saying I can't make any legal threats or 'protest', which is protected int he US constitution. What is your phone number or email bwilkins? Gordonfreemanfan (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CheckUser Confirmed sock - you will need to file a request from the first account you created before an unblock appeal would be considered.

The first amendment gives you the right to express your opinion without American law hindering you from doing so. It does not grant you the right to use Wikipedia and/or Wikimedia Foundation servers to express that opinion. WilliamH (talk) 22:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

freshacconci just said I violated by posting a users email on my talk page? Yet if I don't want my ethnicity gone to detail as to how many germans are in a specific city that gets me banned? This is double standard and will be dealt with, freshacconc.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gordonfreemanfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"We now have a more important issue: you violated our no legal threats policy related to "going to the FBI". Again, this is a PRIVATE website - you AGREED to the rules, and legal threats are an indefinite block" - Bwilkins" This is against the first amendment of the United States constitution. The reason I was blocked was in violation of the first amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." The FBI is the government. And to say I can't peaceful petition the government of grevances is against he law. What bwilkins is writing above is agianst the law. HNe's saying no legal threats are allowed. This is against the first amendment. The United States constitution is the supreme law of the land. [1]Gordonfreemanfan (talk) 22:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have no "right" to use Wikipedia in a disruptive fashion, and certainly not to continue making repeated unblock requests using the same misinformed argument. As such, I have also revoked your talk page access. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 22:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.