User talk:Goonies~enwiki

If you talk here, I'll reply here. If I talk there, please reply there.

re: {{tl|MEEproj}} Spamming

If you hadn't noticed yet: there are concerns about the quality and appropriatness of the artciles created/edit by this project. I'm tagging the article so we know which articles have to be checked and cleaned-up. Even if this wasn't the case, adding such tags is a very common practice on the English Wikipedia. If you don't like the text on the tag, please change it. I would prefer it if you removed your post at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Method Engineering Encyclopedia. Cheers, —Ruud 16:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact I did notice the concerns... thats why I insisted against labeling the ITIL pages with said tag in first place. I don't want to see some good pages beeing deleted from wiki just because some MEE guy corrected a typo on it.

I am not sure if changing the tag is ok as it may be used for other reasons as well. (e.g. marking pure MEE publications?)

Just in case, i'm not part of MEE nor did I know of its existence until today.

Also, if you need help on verifying the content of the tagged pages, feel free to contact me :-) Regards, --Goonies 16:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baslerdüütsch ? / High German Consonant Shift

This seems to be a term that's only used by people who aren't from Basel. Should it be included on the Basel German wiki site? Oh yeah, about the second (High German) consonant shift. The shift from / p t k / to /pf ts kx / and then / f(:) s(:) x(:) / is (to a certain extent) present in all High German dialects, including of course the standard language. However, only High Alemannic (and possibly/historically some Bavarian dialects) went all the way. Standard German only has /pf, f, ts, s, x /, but not /kx/. High Alemannic dialects, on the other hand, don't pronounce "König" with an inital aspirated [k_h] - they use /kx/ instead (possibly /x/ in some dialects - phonetically probably [kX] and [X]) . Basel German always has [k_h] in words like König, even for speakers who (like me) say Chind [X-] instead of Kind [k_h]. I read yesterday on the wikipedia swiss german site that /kx/ is only used in loan/foreign words in Swiss German but that's definitely not true. Or do you think König and Kaiser are (still) loan words? Wathiik (talk) 09:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I answered there --Goonies (Tell me!) 11:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both Standard German and (traditional) Basel German did not shift /k/ > /kx/. Wathiik (talk) 07:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, confusion: In the High German wikipedia article it says:

"..High German languages (in German, Hochdeutsch) are any of the varieties of Standard German..."

This means however I vary standard German, it is within the group of High German languages. But you say Standard German didn't complete the sound shift but High German did?

Also very interesting both the Standard German and the High German article use the translation Hochdeutsch. Help? --Goonies (Tell me!) 15:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ah, I can answer it myself. Using the linked German article, High German should refer to the dialects Hochdeutsche Dialekte rather than Hochdeutsch. --Goonies (Tell me!) 15:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be a bit of a problem - Hochdeutsch (High German)is used for both the name of the standard language as well as High German dialects (as opposed to Low German dialects). In German, there's also the term 'oberdeutsche Mundarten/Dialekte', but I can't think of a translation for oberdeutsch... Only some 'oberdeutsche' dialects shifted /p t k/ in all instances - it'sa question of degree really. And only High Alemannic dialects shifted /k/ to /kx/ in all instances. Standard German shifted /k/ to /x/ in some contexts, High Alemannic dialects (or maybe it's better to say Upper Alemannic, and to speak also of Upper German dialects rather than High German dialects... have to check) shifted /k/ to /x/ in some contexts and /kx/ in others. Some Bavarian dialects may also have had the shift. Wathiik (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Goonies. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Goonies~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

13:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]