Jump to content

User talk:GoonerDP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, GoonerDP, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  AnupamTalk 07:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia{{{

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> -->}#if:Algebra|, as you did to Algebra}}, you will be blocked from editing.

I have identified this edit as the worst sort of vandalism. Very insidious. Don't do it again! DavidCBryant 15:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

[edit]
  1. Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles{{{

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> -->}#if:Seven Wonders of the World|, as you did to Seven Wonders of the World}}. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. {{{ Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> -->}#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} --Kralizec! (talk) 22:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Charles Cornwallis, 1st Marquess Cornwallis. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Edit Summaries

[edit]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) 22:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism

[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to invasion of Goa. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. I did not vandalize. Please check this out - http://mysorechronicles.blogspot.com/2007/01/mysore-rockets-tipu-sultan-inventor-of.html

July 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tibetan Plateau, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Xinjiang, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HkCaGu (talk) 23:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --aktsu (t / c) 20:31, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Freedom of the press has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jusdafax 18:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sock puppetry

[edit]
You have been blocked 2 weeks for sock puppetry. (blocked by MuZemike 21:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Your contributed article, Timeline of hindu history

[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Timeline of hindu history. Firstly thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic one which we already have a page - History of Hinduism. Your enthusiasm is fantastic, but unfortunately your article has been nominated for deletion in accordance with our policies. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we'd love for you to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of Hinduism - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest this deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article you created (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on Talk:Timeline of hindu history explaining your position, although an administrator may still believe deletion to be necessary. Regardless, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, as doing such often creates unnecessary confusion. If you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Hang in there and try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 

A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 00:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nirvana888 (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kalibari-Hyderabad, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hyderabadkalibari.org/about_us.html. As a copyright violation, Kalibari-Hyderabad appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kalibari-Hyderabad has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 19:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Worst Genocide in Human History

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Worst Genocide in Human History. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worst Genocide in Human History. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:35, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shanigram Saraswathi Kshetram

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Shanigram Saraswathi Kshetram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Glenfarclas (talk) 07:27, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again for sock puppetry

[edit]
You have been blocked 1 month for sock puppetry. (blocked by MuZemike 16:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|User:Crouchingdragon090 is not my sock-puppet. I admit I was using Comancheros as a sock-puppet earlier and you blocked me for it. I have stopped using it now. But this is unfair. User:Crouchingdragon090 is not mine.}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This time for using User:Crouchingdragon090 along with this account. MuZemike 16:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I AM NOT CROUCHINGDRAGON090. THIS IS A WRONG DECISION.

Last warning

[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to The Six Sacred Stones, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nirvana888 (talk) 01:25, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Why is everything I write being deleted? What's the matter with you moderators? No one is allowed to correct any errors anymore or what?

Copy and paste between articlesDougweller (talk) 20:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

[edit]

Please note that this is copyright violation if not attributed, see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

Deletion of material you added to history of evolutionary thought

[edit]

For the 2nd time I have deleted material you added to history of evolutionary thought. The material you re-added does not seem to be supported by the sources you cited, and one of those sources is almost certainly not a reliable source per WP:RS. When I deleted the material the first time, I added it to the article talk page along with an explanation of my reasons for the deletion. Before you re-add similar material to the article again I would appreciate it if we could discuss it and the supporting sources on the talk page. Thanks Rusty Cashman (talk) 19:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you have added material to history of evolutionary thought linking the incarnations of Vishnu to the biological evolution of species. Unfortunately the only source that you cite to support that connection is [1], which is not a reliable source per WP:RS. The reasons it does not meet the Wikipedia standards for a reliable source are that it is a self published blog by an author who has no publications, or academic or professional qualifications indicating expertise in any relevant field (biology, history of science, or even Hindu theology). Therefore I have reverted out the material again. Rusty Cashman (talk) 20:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Lost Symbol

[edit]

Hi. Regarding your addition to The Lost Symbol, you placed this text in the middle of another reference. I assume that was just an error on your part.

More importantly, although you provided sources for the correct facts in question, these sources obviously do not mention them in relation to The Lost Symbol. Therefore, the observation that the information in the novel is false comes from you, the editor. This is a violation of No Original Research, in particular WP:SYNTH, as such conclusion or criticism must come from the source in question. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jallianwala Bagh massacre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

This warning concerns your addition of text that violated Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, despite many previous warnings and several blocks over the years for such violations. This also applies to your addition of non-neutral comments to Reginald Dyer. please stop adding your own opinion to articles. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonadea - you are not making much sense. But I guess you have the power as a moderator. Your logic to delete my absolutely correct comments about the incorrect information in the lost symbol was faulty. And now I believe you have a vendetta against me. I know wikipedia is run by western nations and is completely pro-western but I was under the impression (mistaken I believe) that this was some impartiality at play. So unless someone says something glowing about the everything west, one is moderated. Ok, now I get it.

Say something glowing about anything at all - especially something pro-western - and I'll revert it. I detest Wikipedia's US-centrism and European bias very deeply, but adding bias in the other direction is the wrong way to go about it if it's impartiality you are after. Not sure what your "lost symbol" comment refers to. --bonadea contributions talk 18:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonadea - Fair enough. I will be careful in future. Regarding the lost symbol, I was just correcting the comments made by Robert Langdon, the protagonist, about the zero and numerals coming from Arabia. It is now established by several scholars they came from India and traveled through Arabia into Europe. In any case, it is a small issue.

naveenpf (talk) 13:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

[edit]

Please do not repeatedly remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of active separatist movements in Asia here and here, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Quigley (talk) 06:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it for one simple reason. The article is on aspirant SOVEREIGN STATES whereas the states mentioned under India are all aspirant STATES OF INDIA i.e. they want to separate from their current state or province(as called in some countries) and to be a separate state inside India. They don't want to be sovereign nations or states. The word state might have confused someone and they may have added these states to the list. Hence I removed them. The only exception is JAMMU AND KASHMIR which wants to separate from India and to be a sovereign entity. So I did not remove it. In fact I added the name of another militant organization which is fighting for independence there. Pleas either reinstate my edits or revert to me.

No, the article is not only about "aspirant sovereign states"; the first paragraph of the article says that separatism covers both autonomism and secessionism. Therefore, movements in India for more territorial autonomy from the central government are entirely within the scope of the article. Quigley (talk) 07:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Burma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sept. 2012

[edit]

Out of India is already linked under "competing hypotheses" below, but it hasn't received much support from mainstream linguists OR archaeologists, so your edit was unfortunately nonsense.... AnonMoos (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see. It is a competing hypothesis so it is nonsense. -- 15:08, 25 September 2012 GoonerDP
Whatever -- the Anatolian hypothesis is also a "competing hypothesis", but it's achieved some support from archaeologists studying the Indo-European origins problem, which immediately places it on a plane above the Out of India hypothesis. Of course, when it comes to support from actual linguists, the general Kurgan hypothesis comes out on top... AnonMoos (talk) 17:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever studied the Out of India theory or researched how many archaeologists now accept it as a feasible theory? And don't go only on the basis of wikipedia. I have spent a fair amount of time researching the Out of India theory. But you are free to believe what you want to. -- 17:40, 25 September 2012‎ GoonerDP

Really? Some emphasize cultural continuities over time within India, and that's fine as far as it goes -- but what reputable archaeologist supports invasions from India into Central Asia?? AnonMoos (talk) 03:39, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aesop's Fables

[edit]

Your edit here was unsourced and pov, so violating WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. I see a lot of complaints above about your edits, and you don't seem to be heeding them. If you continue this way you are likely to be blocked. Dougweller (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the complaints are from Euro-centric editors who don't like my edits when I point out possible Indian origins or Indian history. I know wikipedia is pro-western but I was under the impression (mistaken it seems) that it was neutral.

Yes - Wikipedia must be neutral. You cannot allow yourself to succumb to the temptation to insert unsourced opinions as facts, as you did here, because that is a breach of neutrality. ("most modern scholars" - who, specifically? Where did they publish this? What are your sources? "typical Euro-centrism" - that is POV, and while you can certainly use the phrasing in a direct quote attributed to a reliable source, you cannot add it as enclycopedic text. "most fables if not all came from Indian origins" - this is addd to the article as if it is an established fact, but it is vague and again unsourced. Etc etc.) As you know, this will get you blocked - and in fact you have already received several final chances. I doubt that you will get another one. Please work towards a less Eurocentric/Western-centric Wikipedia. That is urgently needed. You cannot do that if you get yourself blocked by disregarding the policies that are put there to ensure neutrality. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 09:16, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I take your point and will work accordingly.

February 2013

[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Holy Grail, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I am asking any editor who encounters problems with you again to take you to WP:ANI or contact me to block you. You've had enough warnings and I would be within my rights to block you now. Dougweller (talk) 10:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, GoonerDP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hinduism

[edit]


Hello, GoonerDP. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!



Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GoonerDP&oldid=1054456621"