User talk:Googalyweed1

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Gillweed1995 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to LG Octane, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: LG Octane was changed by Googalyweed1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.987817 on 2011-12-30T00:15:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:Gillweed1995 with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 00:32, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Gillweed1995 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 00:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate Editing

Please stop your disruptive behavior. Thank you. Gillweed1995 (talk) 00:35, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Gillweed1995. Bryce (talk | contribs) 00:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for misbehaving. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:00, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Googalyweed1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not mean any harm. I was just joking around. I won't do it anymore! Googalyweed1 (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, but that's not very convincing. I can't see how you or your previous account are any benefit to the project. —DoRD (talk) 02:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Googalyweed1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know what I did was very stupid, inappropriate, and flat out rude. I seriously would like to be unblocked though. I've been working on trying to update and fillout the articles for LG Cosmos Touch and LG Octane. So far I have a picture for one, tables for both, and I am working on adding more relevant information, but I cannot do so if I am blocked. I know I wil probably just be declined, but it would be great if you could at least reconsider. I sure whatever you choose to do will be just. Googalyweed1 (talk) 04:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - only one request at one of your accounts, please (and I'm declining this one, as this seems to have been your "bad hand" account) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Read my replies on your sock's talk page. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]