User talk:Goodraisin

Welcome

Hello Goodraisin! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! BostonMA talk 21:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Re: Young Life page

Mmm good question, reading the article now I would have raised the same question. I recall removing the unsourced statement and looking to the talk page, but I was sure I saw some concerns there at that time. I probably mistook an old comment for a new one, I saw activity on the talk page and reached out for the newest comments (that are supposed to be at the bottom of the page). I didn't see that the comment in question was written in 2006. (in short, be nice with us, write your comments at the end of the page, not at the top ;)). I have no POV issue with the article the way it is. Sorry! -- lucasbfr ^talk 13:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)