User talk:Good Sumaritan

Notes

User:TouchPoints

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Good Sumaritan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Darkness Shines (talk) 20:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 09:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me to understand what I have done wrong. You have blocked me for WP:DISRUPT (I assume since that is where the link in your message sends me). In what way have I been disruptive? Please indicate which of my edits were problematic. --Good Sumaritan (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Good Sumaritan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I appear to have been blocked for disruptive editing but the blocking administrator has not provided any comment on the manner in which I have been disruptive. I don't believe that any of my editing has violated WP:DISRUPT so this block must have been made in error and should be undone. In any event an indefinite block for a first offense would seem excessive. Good Sumaritan (talk) 03:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for WP:DISRUPT, you were blocked for WP:DUCK - because you quacked. Max Semenik (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've asked the blocking admin to comment here. Nick-D (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MaxSem says it all. Quacking also occurred at User:William M. Connolley/Arbitration committee sanctions (admins can view). I'm disabling talk page access so we don't waste any more time here. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 19:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]