User talk:Goldrushcavi

This user may have left Wikipedia. Goldrushcavi has not edited Wikipedia since April 6, 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Goldrushcavi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --TeaDrinker 07:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Date Links

Well, I've seen them linked in every other article I had seen before Paul Reubens, so I figured maybe it was accidentally unlinked. If they are undesirable, then that may pose a problem for most articles. --Wizardman 18:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalization!

Thank you for experimenting with the page User_talk:216.67.5.228 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 216.67.5.228 01:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning you (a new, anonymous user) for adding misinformation to a page is not vandalism of your talk page... is "vandalization" even a word? lol --Goldrushcavi 04:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wheel of Fortune winners page marked for deletion/merge

Since you created the page, I thought you needed a heads-up. My vote was to merge it with the main show page. Also, can you source the data?JTRH 02:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Let's Make a Deal

Although I cannot do anything about it per Wikipedia rules, I really do not agree with your decision to delete what I consider quite important information concerning the television show Let's Make a Deal.
As you are certainly aware as a game show fan, prior to the 1990s, the networks used scheduling as a strategy for dominance in a part of the broadcast day that proved to be quite profitable for them. The context is highly important to the history of a game (or any other television show), as it usually determines how long a show will last, and thus make an impact upon the culture at large. Thus, I cannot see why those several paragraphs detract, as you claim, from the article; I composed them in the hopes that they would enhance them.
If you would, please discuss this with me before altering other articles I have revised with this in mind. Thank you.Mike 05:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand your wanting to include the information and why you consider it important, but it is also unsourced and as such falls under original research, which is also not allowed. I don't know who we're supposed to "go before" if we have a disagreement (I know it's somewhere in the Wikipedia manual), but this would be a good opportunity to do so. -Goldrushcavi 21:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Emerson_Universal.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Emerson_Universal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. BigDT 12:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ceiling fan article - vandalism

Yo dude, heads up--more vandalizing had been done by 67.43.101.138 to the ceiling fan article. I've reverted certain portions of his edits, and left a lengthy explanation and warning on his talk page (as I saw that you had done twice before), which I think you should read (just click the link of his IP address above).

Thanks for removing more of his anonymous, unsigned, vandalism. He's pushed it too far; I'm requesting admin involvement at this point.

GSN

I see your point on the I.P.'s person's page, HOWEVER, my opinion is that you can leave in the GSN note when it's a show like, Winning Streak or The Better Sex, where GSN has aired the only episodes in existence (Well, TBS has a pilot and the finale out there, but hopefully you see my point...). FamicomJL 01:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

100% correct, we are on the same page. I don't even think an "All episodes exist" mention is even needed for shows past like 1986, the shows are bound to exist. FamicomJL 04:12, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ceiling fan article - number of blades

Hey JW, I actually think I was wrong in editing the ceiling fan article to say "one to six blades", in light of what you pointed out about the Monte Carlo spider-of-death thing, and the antique Guth fans. I've edited it back to say "two to six" blades, and added notes that (a) some specialized art fans have other numbers of blades, such as one or eight or more, and (b) most residential fans have four or five blades, and most industrial fans have three blades. Piercetheorganist 00:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GUTS

Ok, I restored most of those edits for the events, but I tried to follow your guidelines. I'm refraining from naming specific players' instances, and won't restore the Taglines. Hope everything is ok now. 72.89.225.181 23:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Game show articles

If someone's doing something unusual, you may want to note that. Usually when I'm looking at the vandal board (and as far as I know this is often the case), we're looking for blatant vandalism—"PENIS LOL", totally and blatantly false information ("George Washington was born in 1950") or the like. Can you give me some examples of the edits where he's falsifying? That subtle misinformation is some of the worst vandalism, if someone's up to that, I won't hesitate to block them. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ceiling fan article edits 8/2

Hey man, I saw what you did with the ceiling fan article; great edits! Keep 'em coming! Piercetheorganist 00:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Individual server rules in Four Square

Individual server rules in Four Square, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Individual server rules in Four Square satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individual server rules in Four Square and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Individual server rules in Four Square during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chunky Rice 02:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An AfD typically runs for 5 days. Of course, should the article not survive AfD, you can always ask for it to be moved to user-space where you can work on indefinitely until it's ready to move back into article space. Further, I appreciate that this content was moved from another article, but my reading of Wikipedia policy indicates that such an article is inappropriate. -Chunky Rice 05:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV report

I took your report off AIV as it is meant for currently active vandals, not ones who made their last questionable edits two days ago. I recommend instead that you take this to WP:AN/I where another administrator can decide what to do. Daniel Case 04:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hunter Original.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Hunter Original.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell ^babelfish 02:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jon, I added a "public domain" release to the photo. Doing so was VERY presumptuous of me, and I sincerely hope you don't mind, but I figured you'd rather the photo stay in the article and not get deleted, especially in the event that you didn't go on your computer for a few days and didn't see the issue (it was tagged for speedy deletion). Hope that's ok! Ciao. Piercetheorganist 02:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeopardy! set evolution

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Jeopardy! set evolution, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jeopardy! set evolution

I have nominated Jeopardy! set evolution, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! set evolution (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion of Jeopardy! Set Evolution was highly unnecessary, as it appears to have upset some Jeopardy! fans. If anybody is reading this message, please reconstruct Jeopardy! Set Evolution.--Tomballguy (talk) 23:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Chris[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jeopardy! set evolution

A tag has been placed on Jeopardy! set evolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 16:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jeopardy! audition process

I have nominated Jeopardy! audition process, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! audition process (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 21:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeopardy! audition process for deletion

The article Jeopardy! audition process is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! audition process until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 18:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Biggest wins and losses on Wheel of Fortune listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Biggest wins and losses on Wheel of Fortune. Since you had some involvement with the Biggest wins and losses on Wheel of Fortune redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeopardy! page

I had a speedy delete on a Jeopardy! page that you created. Someone vandalized the page and I clicked on Speedy Delete. This has been remedied and I apologize for any concern. The vandalism has been reverted. Regards, --Man way 03:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeopardy! set evolution for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeopardy! set evolution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! set evolution (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Talk:Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show)/Biggest wins and losses

Talk:Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show)/Biggest wins and losses, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show)/Biggest wins and losses and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show)/Biggest wins and losses during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 19:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Goldrushcavi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wait 'til You Have Kids

The article Wait 'til You Have Kids has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced. No results on ProQuest

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trashed (game show)

The article Trashed (game show) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sourcing found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shopping Spree for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shopping Spree, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopping Spree until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trashed (game show) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trashed (game show) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trashed (game show) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beat the Crusher

The article Beat the Crusher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2019

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Beavis and Butt-Head characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Beavis and Butt-Head characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Beavis and Butt-Head characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cheerio, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 12:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]