User talk:Godmadeuniverse1

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Godmadeuniverse1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Rio Dell, California does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Darkwind (talk) 04:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that welcome message didn't say exactly what I was hoping for. Making an edit specifically for the purpose of changing the terms already in use in an article from "same-sex" and "opposite-sex" to "heterosexual" and "homosexual" can be seen as trying to push a particular point of view in violation of the NPOV policy. The *-sexual terms are more politically charged, and are less neutral. Please do not edit articles specifically to insert these less neutral terms. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 04:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rio Dell, California with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anirudh Emani (talk) 06:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rio Dell, California. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rio Dell, California was changed by Godmadeuniverse1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930856 on 2011-09-17T06:09:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rio Dell, California, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you! -- Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Rio Dell, California. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Darkwind (talk) 21:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rio Dell, California, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rio Dell, California was changed by Godmadeuniverse1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97178 on 2011-09-19T00:02:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Godmadeuniverse1. You have new messages at Talk:Rio Dell, California.
Message added 03:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Darkwind (talk) 03:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rio Dell, California, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rio Dell, California was changed by Godmadeuniverse1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969767 on 2011-09-22T04:53:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Rio Dell, California

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Rio Dell, California. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Godmadeuniverse1 reported by User:Darkwind (Result: 48h). EdJohnston (talk) 23:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no autoblock on your account so far as I can tell. Open up Wikipedia:Sandbox and try to save a trivial edit. If you can save a change there, you are not blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 05:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rio Dell, California, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rio Dell, California was changed by Godmadeuniverse1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961082 on 2011-09-26T05:31:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Godmadeuniverse1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

75.36.247.216 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Godmadeuniverse1". The reason given for Godmadeuniverse1's block is: "Edit warring: "

Blocking administrator: EdJohnston (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: No such autoblock is currently in force. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continuing with the same edit war that led to your previous block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Godmadeuniverse1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Godmadeuniverse1 (talk) 16:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Heterosexual and homosexual are in the dictionary. Political pressure could have been put on the census bureau. The amount of straight people and homosexuals should not be on pages about towns and cities. 'Same-sex' isn't neutral and uses the word sex when homosexuality is the opposite of sex. Your terms are distortions not accurate or neutral and your trying to push your 'Neutral Point Of View' which is not 'Neutral'.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Godmadeuniverse1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Godmadeuniverse1 (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If that is your reason avove, I don't think it is sufficient to unblock you.. Homosexuality is not the opposite of sex. We do try to push a Neutral Point Of View WP:NPOV. That means we adopt and try to maintain a neutral tone in articles, and not one biased by company allegiance, religious affiliation, sexual orientation or any other such consideration. Peridon (talk) 17:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please could you keep unblock requests or other comments in their chronological order, as it makes life much easier for us. On the other hand, it isn't compulsory.... Peridon (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Godmadeuniverse1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Heterosexual and homosexual are in the dictionary and define 2 opposing views of sexuality. Political pressure could have been put on the census bureau. The amount of straight people and homosexuals should not be on pages about towns and cities. 'Same-sex' isn't neutral and uses the word sex when homosexuality is the opposite of sex. Your terms are distortions not accurate or neutral and your trying to push your 'Neutral Point Of View' which is not 'Neutral'.

Decline reason:

The same rationale was already declined above. To be specific, though, you must address the reason for your block. You were edit warring to keep your preferred version of Rio Dell, California, so please tell us what you are going to do about your behavior. —DoRD (talk) 20:03, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.