User talk:Goalcy

Goalcy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Goalcy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello, I'm Landroving Linguist. Your recent edit(s) to the page Ethiopia appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You changed the wording of a category in a sourced diagram, so that it no longer corresponded to the content of the source. Furthermore, going through your recent edits, you do not make use of edit summaries, and this may lead to other editors not understanding the reasons for your edits, and more reverts. LandLing 07:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Norway on 22 July 2021 were reverted by me

Hello Goalcy,

Your edits to article Norway made on 22 of July, 2021 were reverted by me today. I believe that your edits were made with the best of intentions, but they removed a link I thought others might find useful, and flattened a structured list (raising sub-items in sub-lists to the same level as the first level of the list). I'm not sure why you did that so I reverted those edits. Feel free to revert my most recent edit if you disagree, but please explain to me why so I can understand your rationale.

Sincerely, Talib1101 (talk) 23:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Goalcy! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! CMD (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ethiopia. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Remember my admonission from July 19 on this talk-page? Now you have done the exact same edit, changing the text to something the stated source does not say, and once more you have followed your bad habit of not using edit summaries. You are crossing the boundary into disruptive editing. LandLing 14:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for inputs

A Peer review request has been made for article Islamic marriage contract to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved.

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Religion in Tanzania, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Rajputbhatti per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajputbhatti. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]