User talk:GoNinjaGo10Years

Angry Birds Dream Blast moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Angry Birds Dream Blast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 23:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Angry Birds Dream Blast.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Angry Birds Dream Blast.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angry Birds Dream Blast (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add some reviews of the game in reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angry Birds Dream Blast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Angry Birds Dream Blast, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GoNinjaGo10Years! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red (Angry Birds) (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube links as references are generally considered unreliable and the draft needs more secondary reliable sources before moving into mainspace. The draft also feels as if it is written as an advertisement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Red (Angry Birds) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Red (Angry Birds), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SlySabre (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AB Original Five Birds.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AB Original Five Birds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Birds and Wikipedia

After crossing paths while editing the Angry Birds page, I couldn't help but notice your enthusiasm for editing pages and creating redirects related to this franchise. It's exciting to see such interest. However, I have noticed a couple of things, and I wanted to share some advice with you regarding editing on Wikipedia. First, I would recommend taking the time to peruse some of the Wikipedia policy and guideline pages (I have a table on my user page of some that I frequently refer to). In particular, I would recommend looking at Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Essentially, just because something is true or factual, does not mean that it warrants inclusion within Wikipedia. For example, I know you love Angry Birds and would probably love to see the list of characters restored. However, that only interests a very small percentage of the world (WP:FANCRUFT), and the more important aspects would include the cultural significance, character development, etc. Regarding the Angryverse, I would also point you towards the subheading WP:CRYSTAL, meaning that Wikipedia does not predict the future. Most of the information about this game is mere speculation, so I would generally say that it is WP:TOOSOON to consider discussing it. I hope some of this helps you as you continue to navigate Wikipedia. Happy editing, TNstingray (talk) 23:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Angryverse" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Angryverse and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 31#Angryverse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 23:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Angry Birds Dream Blast

Hello, GoNinjaGo10Years. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angry Birds Dream Blast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Angry Birds Dream Blast

Hello, GoNinjaGo10Years. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Angry Birds Dream Blast".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Raynolds

Hello, GoNinjaGo10Years. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Raynolds, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Raynolds

Hello, GoNinjaGo10Years. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Raynolds".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Demae Channel

Hello, GoNinjaGo10Years. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Demae Channel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]