User talk:Gmandler
Welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/300px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Face-grin.svg/25px-Face-grin.svg.png)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Gmandler! I am Calaka and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Calaka (talk) 10:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
[edit] If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jean Matter Mandler, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Just so you know...
[edit]- Your edits are being discussed here. Feel free to comment. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 21:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
[edit] Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jean Matter Mandler, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:07, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Tips for Jean Matter Mandler article
[edit]Hi, I saw the section on this article over on the COI noticeboard. I'll echo a sentiment from there that I hope all this doesn't put you off of Wikipedia. Speaking as a COI patroller, any time we see usernames close to the name of the article, all sorts of alarm bells go off. In any case, it should soon quiet down, as you do seem to be respecting the neutrality policies very nicely. In the process of looking over the article, though, I see a couple of other items that have popped up, so I thought I'd come by and offer some tips:
Inline Citations: You mentioned on the article talk page that you had listed sources, but aren't sure how you could make them inline references. Ideally, anytime a factual statement is made that someone could possibly question, you would put a supporting cite inline. An example would be: "Mandler's early research was on animal learning,<citation would go here to any published works, or better, a peer-review of such a work> and in the 1960s she worked on textual analysis,<citation here, same as the previous> including the development of a widely used story grammar." The inline citation would support the sentence, and would not necessarily have to be any more comprehensive. As long as it is a reliable source, it only needs to support the sentence, even if the rest of the source is dedicated to something/someone else.
Maintenance templates: I see you've been notified for removal of maintenance templates (those boxes at the top of the article listing any issues). Those really need to stay until the issues they mention are fixed. This is not to stamp a "scarlet letter" on the article, but rather to alert other users who may be able to help. Any time one of those templates goes on an article, it gets added to a browseable/searchable Category (basically a list of articles with similar issues). Others periodically go through those lists, and add citations or otherwise fix the problems on articles with which they may be familiar (just as I help out on COI issues). The Inline Citation tag can be removed once such citations are added.
Hope this helps! ArakunemTalk 18:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Reference errors on 17 September
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the George Mandler page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Journal of General Pschology
[edit]Template:Journal of General Pschology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)