Jump to content

User talk:Glen5544

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Glen5544, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Luksuh 23:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for writing the article Gem's the Breaks. Unfortunately it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles. However, please do not be disheartened by what may happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted. Please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For help, see Help:Contents. To find out what will probably be deleted, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top.

Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of Total Drama Island episodes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Techman224Talk 18:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The [recent edit] you made to the page Total Drama Action has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza 04:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move titles of movies to titles you made up because it "sounds better". Elbutler (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Total Drama Action. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 16:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Total Drama Action Articles

[edit]

Dude, this editing with the elimination table has to stop. Everytime you edit it, the table looks or gets screwed up and I have to be the one to revert it. A little advice, if you HAVE to edit the table, make sure you know the facts of what you are saying because I've been watching you edit over "who goes home" all the way back to Ep. 3 or 4, and so far, you've been WRONG on all of them. I know you probably want to be the big hero, and edit the table before anyone else, but I'm trying to tell you in the best tone I can, that it will get reverted by either me or TDI19. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbhinton15 (talkcontribs) 01:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No i can't do that because it wouldn't be right...Bbhinton15 (talk) 02:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At the moment, no... -Preceding comment added by Bbhinton15 (talk) 03:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Got any proof? If not, then it's not worth putting on the article. -Bbhinton15 (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, is that you that keeps editing the article's table? It's starting to get annoying, and when I said proof, i meant, like, from a website, not by what other people think. -Bbhinton15 (talk) 21:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's where you are supposed to go if you have something in mind, even though it might not be true. So the DISCUSSION would be better. The reason I didn't want you putting stuff on the article that might not be true, is because someone may read it, get their hopes up, and when it doesn't happen, they get upset and start messing up the articles. -Bbhinton15 (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, did you put up that stuff about Episode 7 on the List of Total Drama Action Episodes' Article? If you did, you need to put some kind of proof citation on it, becuase so far, no one has heard any type of news concerning Episode 7. Besides, all episodes air on Sundays; you have the next episode airing on a Thursday. It's all starting to get annoying. -Bbhinton15 (talk) 21:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Will you please stop hating on Lindsay. Episode 10 has already been proven to be a reward challenge. -Bbhinton15 (talk) 01:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no it hasnt i herd its an elimination episode

It's a reward challenge. Just because you HEARD something doesn't mean that's what it is. Screaming Gaffers win but they decline the reward (for some unknown reason). Besides, just because episodes are elimination, doesn't mean that Lindsay would go home. Stop hating on her. It's stupid, because almost every episode you edit, you make it so Lindsay goes home, when this whole time, it hasn't been true. -Bbhinton15 (talk) 01:11, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

[edit]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Total Drama Action. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Rumors do not belong in the episode tables. —C.Fred (talk) 23:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of characters from Total Drama Island. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HarlandQPitt (talk) 22:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

[edit]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Total Drama Action. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Do not add plot details for unaired episodes. Unless they can be backed up with a very reliable source, it's speculation, and Wikipedia is not the grapevine. —C.Fred (talk) 20:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]