User talk:Glbuganz

Speedy deletion nomination of Half white

Hello Glbuganz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Half white for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I've said there, it may be a valid encyclopedic topic, likely at Semestre bianco rather than "half white" - but you need to write in proper English. What you've written is identical to a Google Translate translation and it's gibberish. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do that - it's rude. I'm trying to help you. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The standard English translation for this is "white semester" and it is used in English language books on Italian government and politics, and in English press articles, e.g. [1], [2]. I have created the article Semestre bianco with a redirect from White semester. Voceditenore (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vivalto (Train)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vivalto (Train) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cosplaxy.com/?lan=IT&key=RhU9BSxeSCH1j8Vk2js6+pohcwt8UocS5nISHnx8pgs=. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crow^Caw 19:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Viva Radio 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viva Radio 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viva Radio 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Europa 7

The article Europa 7 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to satisfy GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 14:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]