User talk:Gladynova
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Gladynova, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Your contributions
[edit]Hello Gladynova. I've removed your addition of Category:Czech people of German descent to Czech biographical articles. The information about someone's family background must be referenced by reliable sources, especially when you write about living people. Thanks for your understanding. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]This is your only warning. If you persist in adding categories to biographies that are not supported in the body of the article, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 04:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Hungarian names, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Gladynova, I just reverted your recent edits. I'm sorry, but this is not the way to go on Wikipedia. First of all, there was way too much detail in there; it was excessive. Second, nothing there was even remotely verified, and that can't be. In addition, I see that that criticism has been leveled at your edits before--but it's core policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 03:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC)