User talk:Ginam44098

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Karki (surname), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karki (surname), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Karki (surname) was changed by Ginam44098 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857658 on 2020-09-04T12:58:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Karki (surname). - Arjayay (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are publishing fake things saying karki are bramhins. Ginam44098 (talk) 13:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do some research about Karki surname which has no Indian origin but Nepal.Kharki is a name of place in uttarkhand . People there have no Indian origin surname of Karki or Kharki. Please don't post fake things. Ginam44098 (talk) 13:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karki (surname). - Arjayay (talk) 16:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dhungana has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dhungana was changed by Ginam44098 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908433 on 2020-09-09T12:20:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dhungana. - Arjayay (talk) 10:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dhungana. - Arjayay (talk) 12:55, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ginam44098 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why Arjayay has been Vandalizing my article. Arjayay changing my article and he is not replying to my post. Please check the facts on Gyanendra Prasad Dhungana. He is CEO of Nepal Bangladesh Bank but yet the user Id Arjayay is Vandalizing the article and start to Disruptive edit the article.Gyanendra Prasad Dhungana is consider as a major banker in Nepal but he do not have a Wiki page. He vandalize a lot of this like removing Hinduism from Dhungana which is really a racist move and I check his page. He is from England and I assume that why is he so racist and have racist thoughts on Hinduism. Please , unblock me so I want to stop Vandalism from him which is really racist. Ginam44098 (talk) 07:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for what others did, but for what you did. We cannot see your race through the computer, so that is not relevant insofar as the reason for any edits. Note that not every person in a field merits a Wikipedia article, it depends on the coverage in independent reliable sources, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. As this request does not discuss how your actions violated policy, but attempts to justify them instead, there are no grounds to lift the block. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What you did? Meaning what? Wikipedia never post a tutorial on how to edit articles. Only select few are able to do so. Not a correct source for any information. There should have been at least a 4 warning but no. There was no warning what so ever. Just one and I'm still new to wikipedia on Editing. I could have done a proper editing if there was easiest way to learn things here. Ginam44098 (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Morderngoogle per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Morderngoogle. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ginam44098 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So, I don't know why I have been only editing on the article Dhungana for Vandalism. I have a shared internet connection. Ginam44098 (talk) 04:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 11:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ginam44098 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Haha you guys are funny. Wiki can never change the history. Ginam44098 (talk) 05:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 06:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.