User talk:Gilgamesh~enwiki/Archive 18
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Gilgamesh~enwiki. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 |
Gnuboy listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gnuboy. Since you had some involvement with the Gnuboy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:02, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rifka
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rifka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Greyjoy talk 06:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Gilgamesh~enwiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Gnuboy
I've closed Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_October_22#Emulators as "delete all". Since you participated in the discussion as a substantial contributor to both Gnuboy and the article, I've moved the page history of Gnuboy to your userspace at User:Gilgamesh~enwiki/Gnuboy.
Also, would you like some help in archiving your talk page? I saw the "archives" section at the top of your user talk but all the archives are empty. Deryck C. 11:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Understood. And yeah, my talk page has gotten out of hand. I guess I would appreciate the help with archiving. - Gilgamesh (talk) 18:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- It appears the old talk pages were moved to my updated userspace, but the links have not, which is why they're red links. - Gilgamesh (talk) 18:03, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Talk page archiving
I've fixed the archive page structure and links, mostly by switching to the standard format involving {{archives}} and {{aan}}. I've also queued up a bot to put all threads older than a year into new archives for you. Let's see whether it works when the bot runs again (which should be in the next 24 hours).
User:Gilgamesh~enwiki/Template:Talk is mostly redundant now. Would you want me to deprecate it altogether for you, or keep it as a wrapper so that you can add header notices into it in the future? Deryck C. 12:29, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- The bot did exactly what I hope it'd do. Your talk page should be nice and serviceable now. Thank you User:Σ for the lovely bot! Deryck C. 10:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! As for your question about User:Gilgamesh~enwiki/Template:Talk, I don't know. It's been years since I manually archived my talk and I forget what's what. - Gilgamesh (talk) 19:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Volcanism of the Mediterranean has been nominated for discussion
Category:Volcanism of the Mediterranean, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Mizrahi Hebrew for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mizrahi Hebrew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizrahi Hebrew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:C-mh
Template:C-mh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Vegelate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable dictionary definition
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 04:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Marvin Goldstein for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marvin Goldstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Goldstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StonyBrook (talk) 01:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:Muslim Zionists has been nominated for discussion
Category:Muslim Zionists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 21:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Geoshitties
Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Geoshitties, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. gnu57 21:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Seriously, I'm shocked that redirect still existed. I must have created it, like...a decade and a half ago or something. I never even considered it vandalism at the time, because not only was GeoCities still around (it closed in 2009 outside Japan), but the pejorative nickname was one I frequently heard for it. I mean, at the time I thought a pejorative name redirect was as good as any other, except that it takes a naive and/or immature mind to think people will seriously search for it under that name. - Gilgamesh (talk) 07:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Category:Wikipedia Hebrew script templates has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wikipedia Hebrew script templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
help with Irish name
Hi Gilgamesh,
I was wondering if you could help me with Bébinn / Bebhionn. Taking the syllables separately, I get [ˈbʲeː-vʲiːn̪ˠ], but I don't know if the second syll reduces to schwa. Or if the two spellings Bébinn and Bebhionn are actually equivalent.
Please ping me if you respond. Thanks, — kwami (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- As happy as I would be to help you, I'm don't actually know enough about Irish to help you in that particular area. Sorry. - Gilgamesh (talk) 22:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks anyway! — kwami (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Category:Hebrew punctuation has been nominated for merging
Category:Hebrew punctuation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 16:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
"Goidelic" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Goidelic. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 31#Goidelic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 06:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hebrew word templates
A tag has been placed on Category:Hebrew word templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Marshallese name of the Marshalls
Hi Gilgamesh,
Wondering, is the local short name just "Ṃajeḷ", or do you need another word with it? (Please ping me.)
Thanks — kwami (talk) 22:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! — kwami (talk) 01:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
"Yeshayahu" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Yeshayahu. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 24#Yeshayahu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 02:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Sad news
I don't know if you have heard about it (I only recently heard it from a fellow linguist): Steve Trussel passed away in 2020. This[1] is the only info I found on the web. –Austronesier (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, no... :( - Gilgamesh (talk) 20:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
"Omos" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Omos. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 13#Omos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 04:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Terminology
This is by no means a big deal and I mean absolutely no disrespect, but just in case people are too nice to point it out, another quirk you seem to have is your use of geminate(d). It is only consonants that may be single or geminate(d). Vowels are either short or long. Nardog (talk) 14:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- It's probably just a communication quirk, and I always have those in some form or another. I'm aware that I generally have quirks, but I don't notice most of them unless someone points them out, and I can't keep track of all of them in a timely or efficient manner, so doing so is not the best use of my time or energy. In this case, I see ⟨ː⟩ and my mind associates it with gemination, regardless of whether it involves consonants or vowels. No one has ever taken issue with me saying "geminated vowels" before (at least enough to comment on it), nor have I ever really stopped to notice if anyone else doesn't say "geminated vowels," so it strikes me as a non-issue. I'll settle for an adequate level of communication.
- Also, in the case of Icelandic, "short" and "long" vowels traditionally refer to those without or with acute diacritics (a e i o u y vs. á é í ó ú ý, and also historically "short" ö and historically "long" æ if one were to nitpick). But as we know, that stopped being an audible duration distinction long ago, as the "long" vowels all either diphthongized or changed in fundamental vowel quality. Now, "short" vowels, "long" vowels and traditional diphthongs (au ei ey) alike can each have a short or long duration, and the longer duration is what I settle for describing as "geminated," because it can be distinguished with ⟨ː⟩. It's good enough in a crunch.
- Now, if my communication quirks ever, for whatever reason, were to become a significant barrier in the writing and wording of articles themselves, then my fellow editors can assist me by improving on the edits directly, just as we normally assist each other in general. In a talk page, the quirkiness of my wording can't occupy the forefront of my attention, which must be reserved for the cogent discussion points themselves. - Gilgamesh (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)