User talk:Giigly

Ghanshyam Sarda

I am withdrawing the deletion nomination, for now, since the article probably could be salvaged. That said, the page is promotional in nature and cites no third-party references. In fact, coverage of the article's subject in reliable third-party sources is the primary notability criterion; see the notability guidelines for people and organizations.

For example, language like "In 2006, there had been numerous rumors to defame Ghanshyam Sarda by relating him to imaginary scandals, but the supreme court ruled them out!" is unacceptable in an encyclopedic article; see the policy of neutrality. The article needs to cover the event in a neutral and factual manner; it should state just about what accusations have been made and what the Supreme Court verdict said, and all this must be supported by a reference independent of the company, such as a newspaper article. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:47, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arnold Abramyan (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pythoncoder were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arnold Abramyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arnold Abramyan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Giigly! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arnold Abramyan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arnold Abramyan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arnold Abramyan

Hello, Giigly. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arnold Abramyan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 12:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]